2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2021.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generative Adversarial Networks for anomaly detection on decentralised data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed system results compared with the engineering GAN of three representative forms of GANs: i) Jenson Shannon (GAN) [1]; ii) the main difference in l (Wasserstein GAN) [7]; ii) the main difference in l2 (Wasserstein GAN) [9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The proposed system results compared with the engineering GAN of three representative forms of GANs: i) Jenson Shannon (GAN) [1]; ii) the main difference in l (Wasserstein GAN) [7]; ii) the main difference in l2 (Wasserstein GAN) [9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When doing weight struncation; the parameters are sheared in the function mappingφζ(x) in the range [0.01, 0.01]. When applying a weight drop to the unit norm l2, use the following rule, p=min{1,1/kpk2}×p described in [9] for each iteration to update some parameter p. The weight decay factor is set to 0.001 for weight loss. On both experiments, the batch size was set to 500.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation