2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.125.238101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generative Embeddings of Brain Collective Dynamics Using Variational Autoencoders

Abstract: We consider the problem of encoding pairwise correlations between coupled dynamical systems in a low-dimensional latent space based on few distinct observations. We use variational autoencoders (VAEs) to embed temporal correlations between coupled nonlinear oscillators that model brain states in the wakesleep cycle into a two-dimensional manifold. Training a VAE with samples generated using two different parameter combinations results in an embedding that encodes the repertoire of collective dynamics, as well … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We applied this optimization procedure to reproduce the empirical observables for wakefulness, for all human non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep stages (N1, N2, N3), and for propofol-induced sedation and loss of consciousness. We then used the optimal parameters to enhance the BOLD signal lengths of each subject (n=15) up to 30.000 samples for each region of interest [16,17], allowing us to estimate entropy production as done with the ECoG data (Fig. 2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We applied this optimization procedure to reproduce the empirical observables for wakefulness, for all human non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep stages (N1, N2, N3), and for propofol-induced sedation and loss of consciousness. We then used the optimal parameters to enhance the BOLD signal lengths of each subject (n=15) up to 30.000 samples for each region of interest [16,17], allowing us to estimate entropy production as done with the ECoG data (Fig. 2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in recent years to simulate different physiological and pathological brain states, as well as to study in silico their behavior under multiple forms of external perturbations 13,[24][25][26][27] . Thus, our results can be interpreted as a hypothesis-free validation of the Hopf model (also known as Stuart-Landau oscillator), although in our case the oscillations were not always harmonic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the core capacity of a model to capture whole-brain dynamics can be characterized by its repertoire of bifurcations and their classification. For instance, noise-driven models close to a bifurcation (such as the Stuart-Landau oscillator) have been extensively explored and characterized in recent publications 13,[24][25][26][27] . Even though more realistic models offer advantages in terms of interpretability, they cannot escape the fact that most of the time, if not always, the model parameters must be posed next to a bifurcation to adequately reproduce empirical observables 22 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same concept could apply to the development and in silico testing of new pharmaceuticals to treat psychiatric conditions, where whole-brain models could be used to reverse-engineer the optimal receptor affinity profiles required to restore statistical signatures of healthy brain dynamics. Finally, the combination of data produced by whole-brain models and machine learning classifiers could be useful for data augmentation in the context of automated diagnosis of rare neurological diseases [165] and to generate input for deep learning architectures (e.g., variational autoencoders) capable of representing altered states of consciousness as trajectories within a low dimensionality latent space [166].…”
Section: What Can We Learn?mentioning
confidence: 99%