2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2008.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generative models for similarity-based classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In similarity based classification (see, e.g., Cazzanti et al 2008;), an index is defined to measure similarity of an observation with respect to training sample observations, and those similarity measures are used as features to develop a classifier. For instance, a nonlinear support vector machine (SVM) (see, e.g., Vapnik 1998) can be viewed as a similarity based classifier, where a kernel function is used to measure similarity/dissimilarity between two observations.…”
Section: Theorem 2(b) Suppose That the J Competing Classes Satisfy Asmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In similarity based classification (see, e.g., Cazzanti et al 2008;), an index is defined to measure similarity of an observation with respect to training sample observations, and those similarity measures are used as features to develop a classifier. For instance, a nonlinear support vector machine (SVM) (see, e.g., Vapnik 1998) can be viewed as a similarity based classifier, where a kernel function is used to measure similarity/dissimilarity between two observations.…”
Section: Theorem 2(b) Suppose That the J Competing Classes Satisfy Asmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graepel et al (1999) and Pekalska et al (2001) used several standard learning techniques on these similarity based features. A discussion on similarity based classifiers including SVM, kernel Fisher discriminant analysis and those based on entropy can be found in Cazzanti et al (2008). It has been observed in the literature that NN classifiers on similarity measures usually yield low misclassification rates (see, e.g., Cost and Salzberg 1993;Pekalska et al 2001).…”
Section: Theorem 2(b) Suppose That the J Competing Classes Satisfy Asmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do this, classifier parameters and/or knowledge bases are updated with fresh incoming data over the time. Since the similarity-based classifiers are actually most commonly used classifier [5], an adaptive form of them is utilized in this study.…”
Section: Adaptive Similarity-based Classifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in illumination, viewpoint and pose, occlusions, and background clutter make it difficult to construct a robust appearance model which is capable of adapting to changes in the environment. Many appearance models [1,2,3,4] have been proposed for object tracking. These include models based on histograms, kernel density estimates, Gaussian mixture models (GMMs), conditional random fields, subspaces, and discriminative classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%