Generative versus Interpretive Model-Driven Development: Moving Past ‘It Depends’

Overeem, Michiel; Jansen, Slinger; Fortuin, Sven

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-94764-8_10

Cited by 3 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In our experience, scientific knowledge is often scattered among many articles or hidden within theoretical and abstract contributions. In our work on API management [185], model execution approaches [182], and impact analysis [181] we aimed to synthesize the already available knowledge in a form that serves industry. Artifacts as decision support frameworks and maturity models are well suited to communicate these kinds of results.…”

Section: Partnership Between Academia and Industrymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The chapter was originally published [182] as an extension of a conference article [180]. The survey of software producing organizations is based on the thesis work of Sven Fortuin.…”

Section: Chapter 5 -Api Management Maturity Of Ldcpsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These discussions have bent the inward look from AFAS Focus to LCDPs in general. The research and development of AFAS Focus has resulted in contributions such as a comparison of model execution [182], a framework for data migration [186], and a maturity model for API management that is applied to LCDPs [183]. The Impact Analysis for Low-Code Development Platforms framework presented in Section 7.3 is based on the acquired knowledge, research contributions, and experience accumulated throughout these years.…”

Section: Research Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Through a suite of model transformations (the Generator), this model is transformed into a run-time model called the application package. To optimize the model execution approach, AFAS Focus adopted a custom run-time model that is interpreted [182]. The run-time model expresses the component types present in an event sourced system, such as aggregate roots, events, and projectors.…”

Section: Subsystems and Artifactsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…LCDPs apply model-driven development to raise the abstraction level of software development, increasing productivity and decreasing complexity as a result [28]. They target a wide variety of users, from professional software developers to non-technical business experts [182]. The latter category is commonly referred to as the 'citizen developer': people without software development education who nonetheless build software applications.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Evolution of Low-Code Platforms

Overeem¹

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Event sourced systems are increasing in popularity because they are reliable, flexible, and scalable. In this article, we point a microscope at a software architecture pattern that is rapidly gaining popularity in industry, but has not received as much attention from the scientific community. We do so through constructivist grounded theory, which proves a suitable qualitative method for extracting architectural knowledge from practitioners. Based on the discussion of 19 event sourced systems we explore the rationale for and the context of the event sourcing pattern. A description of the pattern itself and its relation to other patterns as discussed with practitioners is given. The description itself is grounded in the experience of 25 engineers, making it a reliable source for both new practitioners and scientists. We identify five challenges that practitioners experience: event system evolution, the steep learning curve, lack of available technology, rebuilding projections, and data privacy. For the first challenge of event system evolution, we uncover five tactics and solutions that support practitioners in their design choices when developing evolving event sourced systems: versioned events, weak schema, upcasting, in-place transformation, and copy-and-transform.

show abstract

Section: Partnership Between Academia and Industrymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The chapter was originally published [182] as an extension of a conference article [180]. The survey of software producing organizations is based on the thesis work of Sven Fortuin.…”

Section: Chapter 5 -Api Management Maturity Of Ldcpsmentioning

confidence: 99%