Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2783258.2788611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generic and Scalable Framework for Automated Time-series Anomaly Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
171
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 365 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
171
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, many anomaly detection techniques simply process data in batches and for this reason are unsuitable for real-time streaming applications. This is the case of Symbolic Aggregate Approximation [18], which has been used to find the most unusual subsequences within a time series, the supervised learning approach by Hermine et al [3], which leverages a combination of a Bayesian maximum likelihood classifier and a linear regression model to spot anomalies in temporal structures, and the Netflix's robust principle component analysis (RPCA) method [22], and Yahoo's EGADS [19].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many anomaly detection techniques simply process data in batches and for this reason are unsuitable for real-time streaming applications. This is the case of Symbolic Aggregate Approximation [18], which has been used to find the most unusual subsequences within a time series, the supervised learning approach by Hermine et al [3], which leverages a combination of a Bayesian maximum likelihood classifier and a linear regression model to spot anomalies in temporal structures, and the Netflix's robust principle component analysis (RPCA) method [22], and Yahoo's EGADS [19].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is generally not application or infrastructure agnostic since they often require intrusive source instrumentation [4] and hence hard to generalize for diverse services and use-cases [8], such as in the cloud computing scenario. This has led to renewed interest within the academic and industrial community in performance anomaly detection techniques that are both scalable and versatile [1], [2], [8]- [13]. However, advancement in service deployment, complex service workloads, and dynamism introduced in cloud computing environments, have led to interesting contextual behaviour in performance metric data that are hardly explored by existing systems.…”
Section: Index Terms-performance Monitoring and Measurement;mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in performance diagnosis, many techniques rely on the premise that statistical distribution of metric measurements is either known or static [12], [20], that monitoring data is available a priori for model selection and training [1], and that what constitute normal and/or abnormal behaviour is well delineated [4]. This somewhat limits their applicability in realtime scenarios where they may generate many false-alarms as baselines become obsolete [8]. This is not desirable since the cost of missing an anomaly is often very high.…”
Section: Index Terms-performance Monitoring and Measurement;mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations