Genesis of an innovation-based entrepreneurial ecosystem: exploring the role of intellectual capital

Abstract

PurposeThe aim of the study is to explore the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems (EE) and highlight the role played by intellectual capital (IC) in that process. Specifically, the paper adopts the collective intelligence approach, and the study shows how human capital (HC), structural capital (SC) and relational capital (RC) interact to create an entrepreneurial ecosystem.Design/methodology/approachThe paper adopts a single case study of an Italian EE. The data analysis is based upon the collection of different sources of data: semi-structured interviews with representatives of each actor of the ecosystem; email correspondence; meetings report; a 24-months period of direct observation. Given the novelty of the topic, the qualitative method seems well suited for studying innovation-based EE since the method offers rich data about a phenomenon in real-life context.FindingsThe case is a top-down, innovation-based EE in which all main components of the IC play a crucial role from the initial stage. Findings show how the constant interchange between IC components occurs at two different levels: the micro and the meso level. HC and RC play major roles at both levels, whilst SC only occurs at a meso level, representing the environment in which the whole ecosystem takes place. Additionally, the use case, a new intangible asset integrating all three components of IC, emerged as one of the main outcomes of this innovation-based EE.Originality/valueThe paper contributes to a rather unexplored topic in the existing literature on EE and IC, namely the formation process of EE and the role played by IC within that process. Additionally, through the application of the collective intelligence approach, the authors shed light on the need to manage IC at both micro and meso level in the creation of an EE.

Exploring the relationship between entrepreneurial ecosystem inputs and outcomes: the role of digital technology adoption

“…First, the involvement of the university's researchers in each of the three technological areas guarantees a certain level of quality and commitment to the cause, as well as the possibility of continuously developing and improving the technology. The presence of the university as a partner in FermoTech was one of the main factors that drove end users to join FermoTech (Marinelli et al. , 2022); however, it also appears to be a critical point in the success of the developed use cases.…”

“…For example, financial-related aspects appear to be crucial (Sato et al. , 2012; Marinelli et al. , 2022) since they enable the acquisition of cutting-edge technology and the availability of suitable physical spaces, which is the heart of the FermoTech ecosystem and the basis for the development of technological solutions.…”

Framing the main patterns of an academic innovation ecosystem. Evidence from a knowledge-intensive case study

“…The first one concerns the idea of collective intelligence (Levy, 1994). The collective intelligence approach states that multiple independent actors who work together may perform better (more intelligently) than any individual actor working alone (Marinelli et al, 2022). In this sense, a collective approach model pushes agents of a system working to foster participative forms of collaboration enhancing innovation.…”

Guest editorial: Unveiling the roles of intellectual capital in entrepreneurial ecosystems: evidence from moderate innovative countries

“…The first section contains two articles. Marinelli et al . (2023) adopt an unconventional collective intelligence approach with a two-year, longitudinal single-case study on the Italian EE FermoTech to elucidate the individual effects of three dimensions of IC (i.e.…”

“…Unravelling the various roles of the overall IC and its subdimensions in EEs The first section contains two articles. Marinelli et al (2023) adopt an unconventional collective intelligence approach with a two-year, longitudinal single-case study on the Italian EE FermoTech to elucidate the individual effects of three dimensions of IC (i.e. HC, SC and RC) and their interacting mechanisms on the process of forming a top-down, innovation-based EE.…”