1960
DOI: 10.2113/gsecongeo.55.2.255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genesis of the Gore Mountain garnet deposit, New York

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These have all been characterised for δ 18 O in the University of Oregon laser fluorination stable isotope laboratory. Our primary SIMS RM is called ‘UAG’ (sample number S0068), a megacrystic pyrope garnet from the Gore Mountain Mine (Bartholomé ). Hundreds of ion microprobe analyses in our laboratory on dozens of randomly selected grains strongly suggest that this sample is homogeneous at better than 0.1‰ in 18 O/ 16 O.…”
Section: Experimental Set‐upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These have all been characterised for δ 18 O in the University of Oregon laser fluorination stable isotope laboratory. Our primary SIMS RM is called ‘UAG’ (sample number S0068), a megacrystic pyrope garnet from the Gore Mountain Mine (Bartholomé ). Hundreds of ion microprobe analyses in our laboratory on dozens of randomly selected grains strongly suggest that this sample is homogeneous at better than 0.1‰ in 18 O/ 16 O.…”
Section: Experimental Set‐upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, modal analyses demonstrate that the metagabbro and garnet-amphibolite contain the same percent garnet, i.e., ~13% (Luther, 1976;Sharga, 1986). Together these observations have led researchers to propose that the genesis of the garnet amphibolite was due to a copious infl ux of fl uid along and within ductile shear zones near the steep east-west border fault at temperatures of ~700-750 °C and mid-crustal pressures of 6-8 kbar (Buddington, 1939;Bartholomé, 1960;Luther, 1976;Sharga, 1986;Goldblum and Hill, 1992). Some observers have informally suggested that tonalitic partial melts of the amphibolite matrix were involved in garnet formation and enhanced the transfer of constituents, thus enabling the growth of unusually large crystals.…”
Section: Gore Mountainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5A, 6A, and 6B). As described by Bartholomé (1960), the hornblendite rims do not represent post-garnet reaction rims, but are properly understood as reaction products formed at the same time as the garnet. The presence of fl uids at high temperature facilitates the transport of chemical constituents and greatly favors growth over nucleation.…”
Section: Gore Mountainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reported errors are a quadratic combination of the standard error of the analysis and the standard deviation of the reference materials analyzed together with the unknowns, and the uncertainties per analysis are typically ±0.2 ‰ (2σ). The primary reference material utilized in this study was UWG-2 (a megacrystic pyrope garnet from the Gore Mountain Mine, Bartholomé 1960), with a normalized δ 18 O VSMOW value of 5.72 ± 0.13 ‰ (2σ). The detailed analytical methods and precision and data reduction have been described by Ikert and Stern (2013).…”
Section: Garnet O Isotope Analysis With Simsmentioning
confidence: 99%