1977
DOI: 10.2113/gsecongeo.72.3.443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genesis of the Southeast Missouri lead deposits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many divergent views exist on the questions of the source of the metals, the mechanism of precipitation, and the period of mineralization. Sverjensky (1981), Davis (1977), and Heyl et al (1974) have provided good summaries of different ideas which have been suggested to account for the origin of these Mississippi Valley-type deposits: (1) hydrothermal magmatic ore solutions which originated at depth and rose along fractures in Precambrian basement rocks migrated laterally through the basal Paleozoic Lamotte Sandstone and into the overlying Bonneterre Dolomite (Ohle andBrown, 1954, Ohle, 1976); (2) lead was leached from the Precambrian basement rocks (Heyl, 1967;Kisvarsanyi, 1977); (:3) lead was derived both from the basement rocks and the Paleozoic sedimentary rocks (Brown, 1967); (4) lead was leached primarily from cements of the Lamotte Sandstone (Doe and Delevaux, 1972); (5) metals were released during dolomitization from algal limestones in the back-reef zones of the Bonneterre Dolomite (Davis, 1977); and (6) metals were derived from two sources, one of which is the Lamotte Sandstone (Sverjensky et al, 1979 The controversy about the origin of these deposits may become narrowed once we have firmly established their period(s) of mineralization. Isotopic datings have been attempted to resolve this problem.…”
Section: The Southeast Missouri Lead and Barite Deposits Associated Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many divergent views exist on the questions of the source of the metals, the mechanism of precipitation, and the period of mineralization. Sverjensky (1981), Davis (1977), and Heyl et al (1974) have provided good summaries of different ideas which have been suggested to account for the origin of these Mississippi Valley-type deposits: (1) hydrothermal magmatic ore solutions which originated at depth and rose along fractures in Precambrian basement rocks migrated laterally through the basal Paleozoic Lamotte Sandstone and into the overlying Bonneterre Dolomite (Ohle andBrown, 1954, Ohle, 1976); (2) lead was leached from the Precambrian basement rocks (Heyl, 1967;Kisvarsanyi, 1977); (:3) lead was derived both from the basement rocks and the Paleozoic sedimentary rocks (Brown, 1967); (4) lead was leached primarily from cements of the Lamotte Sandstone (Doe and Delevaux, 1972); (5) metals were released during dolomitization from algal limestones in the back-reef zones of the Bonneterre Dolomite (Davis, 1977); and (6) metals were derived from two sources, one of which is the Lamotte Sandstone (Sverjensky et al, 1979 The controversy about the origin of these deposits may become narrowed once we have firmly established their period(s) of mineralization. Isotopic datings have been attempted to resolve this problem.…”
Section: The Southeast Missouri Lead and Barite Deposits Associated Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equilibrium between the ore fluids and carbonates in other Mississippi Valley-type deposits has been considered as evidence against an acidic pH of the ore fluids and for sphalerite precipitation by the addition of reduced sulfur from a separate source at the site of deposition rather than from one solution carrying both zinc and reduced sulfur (Anderson, 1975(Anderson, , 1983. Some possible mechanisms for the addition of reduced sulfur include mixing with an H2S-rich fluid (Beales and Jackson, 1966;Beales, 1975;Davis, 1977), thermal degradation of organic compounds (Skinner, 1967;Churnet and Misra, 1983), or reduction of sulfates (Barton, 1967;Hersch and Misra, 1979). However, ore fluids with pH values significantly less than neutral can be in equilibrium with carbonate minerals at appropriately high partial pressures of CO2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relationship is well developed in three stratigraphic packages in the United States, with indications of the relationship in other carbonate units. The presence of this spatial relationship in numerous carbonate units throughout North America suggests that regionally dolomitized areas have served as aquifers for mineralizing fluids or even that dolomitization of the limestone released many of the ore-forming elements to mineralizing fluids, as suggested by Davis (1977) for the Southeast Missouri lead district. These inferences are supported by the spatial relationship of MVT mineralization to dolomite fronts, but also by the regional similarity of mineralization within each of the stratigraphic packages.…”
Section: Relationship To Genesis Of Mvt Mineralizationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This relationship has been noted before, but it is not widely accepted as a primary ore control. For example, Davis (1977) demonstrates that mineralization occurs at the margin of dolomitization of the Bonneterre Formation in the Viburnum Trend of southeast Missouri. Fulweiler and McDougal (1971) and McCormick et al (1971) describe the relationship between dolomite (recrystallized from limestone) to ore-bearing structures in the East Tennessee district.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%