2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.11.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic admixture and language shift in the medieval Volga-Oka interfluve

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…//haam-community.github.io) and various working groups recently embracing Poseidon-based workflows and first papers referencing it explicitly ( [42,43] and other forthcoming work) we indeed see positive signals towards wider adoption. Regardless of whether this development subsists and a community forms around Poseidon, the Poseidon data format and the software developed for it will remain permanently and openly available for future reference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…//haam-community.github.io) and various working groups recently embracing Poseidon-based workflows and first papers referencing it explicitly ( [42,43] and other forthcoming work) we indeed see positive signals towards wider adoption. Regardless of whether this development subsists and a community forms around Poseidon, the Poseidon data format and the software developed for it will remain permanently and openly available for future reference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Critically the long-term success of Poseidon depends on scientists and generally practitioners in the field of archaeogenetics to reroute resources, not least time, into its development and maintenance, if they consider it valuable for their research and publications. With emerging initiatives like the HAAM Community (https://haam-community.github.io) and various working groups recently embracing Poseidon-based workflows and first papers referencing it explicitly ([42, 43] and other forthcoming work) we indeed see positive signals towards wider adoption. Regardless of whether this development subsists and a community forms around Poseidon, the Poseidon data format and the software developed for it will remain permanently and openly available for future reference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…After analyzing the results of the PCA and Admixture analysis, as well as available historical information, we selected populations that could participate in the formation of the genome of Prince Dmitry Alexandrovich: the genomes of the early medieval population of the east of Scandinavia; representatives of the Iranian-speaking nomads of the Eurasian steppes of the Iron Age, and the population of the early Middle Ages of Central Europe, which includes a well-known component of the steppe nomads and samples of individuals representing the ancient East Eurasian component. To assess the contribution of the Slavic component to the genome of Prince Dmitry Alexandrovich, samples of the Medieval Russian population of the XI century from the rural necropolis of the Shekshovo settlement in Suzdal Opolye and an individual of the XII century from the territory of modern Vladimir (Sungir6) were used [ 43 , 44 ]. Several models were tested:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hypothesize that alternative models – replacing the population of “Vikings” with Medieval Russian Slavic populations – will likely also provide a fit. Since the pagan Slavic tradition practiced cremation until the end of the X century, we used samples of the medieval Russian population of the XI century from the rural necropolis of the settlement of Shekshovo9 in the Suzdal Opolye and an individual of the XI century from the territory of modern Vladimir, Russia (Sungir6) [ 42 , 43 ]. The genomes of individuals from Shekshovo9 are the result of a mix of the Central European (Slavic) and local (Finnish) genetic components, while Sungir6 is considered a pure Medieval Russian Slavic population.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Samoyedic-speaking populations inhabit the northernmost region of Siberia (Nganasans, Enets, and Nenets) as well as the Yenisei River basin to the south (Selkups). Although ancient genomes have been only scarcely reported in these regions, the Siberian ancestry was present in a larger area in the past, including early Metal Age individuals from Bolshoy Oleni Ostrov in the Kola Peninsula, Iron Age individuals from the eastern Baltic Sea, and Iron Age individuals from the Volga–Oka interfluve ( Lamnidis et al 2018 ; Saag et al 2019 ; Peltola et al 2023 ). Together with the genetic analysis of present-day populations, these studies suggest that the populations with the Siberian ancestry once occupied a large area in Siberia and northeastern Europe and formed a substratum for the genetic profile of present-day populations in the regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%