2000
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.2000.6989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Algorithm Approach to Particle Identification by Light Scattering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
5

Year Published

2001
2001
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Each search ran for three generations and had a mutation factor of 0.9. A population size of 50 is usually sufficient, however, the larger population ensures that the solution converges and that the highly complex solution space [ Hodgson , 2000] is thoroughly searched. The retrieved m r of each of these six searches varied less than 1% from the average GA‐determined refractive index of 1.48.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each search ran for three generations and had a mutation factor of 0.9. A population size of 50 is usually sufficient, however, the larger population ensures that the solution converges and that the highly complex solution space [ Hodgson , 2000] is thoroughly searched. The retrieved m r of each of these six searches varied less than 1% from the average GA‐determined refractive index of 1.48.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because it is a directed search method, it has the advantage of computational efficiency, and as it is not an analytical inversion, scattering solutions based on non-spherical shapes can be readily adapted. Hodgson (2000) has shown that the GA method is very effective in retrieving the correct solution from the many possible minima in the highly convoluted solution space of a similar problem. There are other possible optimization or search methods, i.e., lookup table methods or simulated annealing, but we chose the GA as we have experience with the GA software library used in this study and because our goal is not an examination of the methods, but in the result of the retrieval.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have developed a genetic algorithm (GA) method to determine the real refractive index (GA m r ), the mean diameter (GA E(x)) and standard deviation (GA SD), assuming a lognormal distribution, from angular scattering measurements made with a 21 channel, dual polarization polar nephelometer (PN) (Barkey et al 2007). The GA method is particularly useful due to the highly irregular solution space of the scattering inversion problem (Hodgson 2000) and because the GA method is an optimization scheme, and not an analytical inversion, an examination of the problem to ensure closure, i.e., to ensure that the problem has a meaningful result is not necessary. Instead, as discussed in this paper, the convergence behavior of each problem is used to determine the soundness of the problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%