2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvcir.2014.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic algorithm based on discrete wavelet transformation for fractal image compression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison, between fractal image and audio coding, there have been many articles published on fractal image coding [18,19,21,[30][31][32] while there is less on Fractal Audio Coding as presented above. Further research is required in the area of Fractal Audio Coding in terms of encoding time, compressed audio quality and compression ratio in order to effectively use with the audio files and stand side by side with other audio compression techniques.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, between fractal image and audio coding, there have been many articles published on fractal image coding [18,19,21,[30][31][32] while there is less on Fractal Audio Coding as presented above. Further research is required in the area of Fractal Audio Coding in terms of encoding time, compressed audio quality and compression ratio in order to effectively use with the audio files and stand side by side with other audio compression techniques.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic algorithm based on discrete wavelet transformation for fractal image compression [17] is implemented to overcome drawbacks of time-consuming fractal coder. The proposed method is 100 times faster than the full search method.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, a FIC (Fractal Image compression) using DWT is proposed to ignore unnecessary MSE computations produced by Dihedral transformations. The proposed Generic algorithm is 100 times faster than the full search method with the penalty of 1.13 dB decay at the retrieved image quality [25].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%