2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-003-1606-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic-algorithm-based optimal tolerance allocation using a least-cost model

Abstract: Conventional tolerance analysis is tedious and time consuming, which makes engineers resist doing it. Complex assembly problems are generally beyond the capabilities of most design and manufacturing engineers. In this paper, genetic algorithm, a kind of non-traditional optimization technique is used as the basic foundation for optimal tolerance allocation to help design and manufacturing engineers to overcome the shortcomings in the conventional tolerance stack analysis and allocation system.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And we also consider the lapping process of the machine tool slideway is the main job in machine tool assembly, then the slideway length of every axes are considered as the lapping process size. So, according the lapping processes cost-tolerance functions data and the process size, we determined the values of a i , b i , and e i , as shown in Table 3.Here the value a i is assumed to be 0 $, because it does not affect the optimization calculation, while this value actually depends on the industry, since the setup cost, equipment cost, etc., varies from industry to industry [27]. A series of values of the assembly time T j as described in section 5.1.1 are given also by consulting, as shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Optimization Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…And we also consider the lapping process of the machine tool slideway is the main job in machine tool assembly, then the slideway length of every axes are considered as the lapping process size. So, according the lapping processes cost-tolerance functions data and the process size, we determined the values of a i , b i , and e i , as shown in Table 3.Here the value a i is assumed to be 0 $, because it does not affect the optimization calculation, while this value actually depends on the industry, since the setup cost, equipment cost, etc., varies from industry to industry [27]. A series of values of the assembly time T j as described in section 5.1.1 are given also by consulting, as shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Optimization Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constraint is in the absolute value, shown as the calculation operator abs. ... (27) where (e ia , e ib )i=1,2….,37 are lower bound and upper bound of every accuracy parameter x ei .…”
Section: Optimization Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following are the types of methods for allocation of component tolerance [9,27]: i. Allocation by proportional scaling, ii. Allocation by Constant precision factor, iii.…”
Section: Tolerance Allocation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sivakumar et al [9] and Noorul Haq et al [10,11] introduced evolutionary algorithms to get the optimum tolerance for the mechanical assemblies. Prabhaharan et al [12] introduced the non-traditional approach to find the optimum tolerance and to overcome the traditional tolerance approach. Prabhaharan et al [13] imported a metaheuristic approach as an ant colony algorithm, to simultaneously allocate the tolerance and manufacturing cost.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%