2015 IEEE Underwater Technology (UT) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ut.2015.7108229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic algorithm based optimization technique for underwater sensor network positioning and deployment

Abstract: Underwater acoustic sensor networks (UWSNs) are crucial for a multitude of underwater applications that require wireless operation. The deployment of sensor nodes in an optimal arrangement while overcoming the unique challenges posed by the surrounding medium and energy constraints on the sensors is a non-trivial task for real-world applications. As these characteristics are anisotropic with respect to change in temperature, salinity, depth, pH, and transmission frequency, they need to be accounted for in a dy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The researchers have made numerous efforts to develop efficient routing protocol while considering the unique characteristics of underwater network [26]. There are mainly three categories namely that determine the path: 1) Proactive Routing Protocols (Table Driven): The core function of this protocol is to maintain the routing table containing all routing information to find routes from node to node [25], [27], [28]. This protocol reduces message latency brought by routing discovery.…”
Section: Routing Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The researchers have made numerous efforts to develop efficient routing protocol while considering the unique characteristics of underwater network [26]. There are mainly three categories namely that determine the path: 1) Proactive Routing Protocols (Table Driven): The core function of this protocol is to maintain the routing table containing all routing information to find routes from node to node [25], [27], [28]. This protocol reduces message latency brought by routing discovery.…”
Section: Routing Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This protocol is more suitable for dynamic environments. This protocol is usually used by source initiated by flooding method [25], [27], [28] . This results an increase in message latency unsuitable for UWSNs.…”
Section: Routing Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good deployment can make sensors and AUVs form a good-quality network topology and decrease power consumption to facilitate later tasks of discovering resources and monitoring objects [13], [14], [15]. The work in [16] was based on this concept to consider a linear programming model to search the optimal three-dimensional deployment of sensors. The work in [13] proposed a genetic algorithm to resolve the deployment problem with objective of minimizing the transmission delay time to decrease power consumption, and further extending the lifetime of UASNs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage is that it does not provide a global model and centralized control. The algorithm possesses strong applicability and generality [17]; therefore, it is preferred by scholars in the field of UWSNs [18,19,20,21,22]. Huazheng Du et al [19] proposed an algorithm for underwater sensor networks based on particle swarm optimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm solves the problem of node deployment, and it has the advantage of high convergence speed. Lyer et al [20] proposed a positioning and deployment scheme for UWSNs based on the genetic algorithm by using optimization techniques. Their main objective was to achieve a coverage area of interest with the least number of nodes but easily falls into a local optimum of the considered objective function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%