Proceedings 11th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications
DOI: 10.1109/dexa.2000.875153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic algorithms for automated negotiations: a FSM-based application approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, a number of previous studies, e.g. [26][27][13] [28], have used evolution of FSM as a basis for the creation of agent types.…”
Section: A Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, a number of previous studies, e.g. [26][27][13] [28], have used evolution of FSM as a basis for the creation of agent types.…”
Section: A Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tactics is creation of offers based on certain criteria. Strategies are derived in a formal way (Zlotkin and Rosenschein, 1996) or come from genetic algorithms (Tu et al, 2000). Another research area of automated negotiations is related to formal aspects of arguments and discussions (e.g.…”
Section: E-negotiation Table (Ent)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another authors that have studied genetic algorithms as mechanisms for evolving negotiation strategies are Tu et al (65). However, the representation employed for negotiation strategies is finite state machines (FSM).…”
Section: Automated Negotiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), some intra-team strategies will perform better than others. Some researchers have proposed the use of extensive simulation in the laboratory to assess which strategies would work better in certain specific conditions (63,64,65,66,149,150). The results of these simulations can provide profitable knowledge to be used when the agents face the challenge of selecting an appropriate strategy.…”
Section: A General Workflow Of Tasks For Negotiation Teamsmentioning
confidence: 99%