2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-008-0329-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic algorithms for optimality of data hiding in digital images

Abstract: This paper investigates the scope of usage of Genetic Algorithms (GA) for data hiding in digital images. The tool has been explored in this topic of research to achieve an optimal solution in multidimensional nonlinear problem of conflicting nature that exists among imperceptibility, robustness, security and payload capacity. Two spatial domain data hiding methods are proposed where GA is used separately for (i) improvement in detection and (ii) optimal imperceptibility of hidden data in digital images respect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The research issue became more oriented after that, with the goal of developing sophisticated, robust LSB-based cryptography-steganography that can withstand such steganalysis attacks (Patel and Meena, 2016;Rajendran and Doraipandian, 2017;Shafi et al, 2018). Learning methods, for example, were used to optimise LSB substitution (Maity and Kundu, 2009;Dadgostar and Afsari, 2016).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research issue became more oriented after that, with the goal of developing sophisticated, robust LSB-based cryptography-steganography that can withstand such steganalysis attacks (Patel and Meena, 2016;Rajendran and Doraipandian, 2017;Shafi et al, 2018). Learning methods, for example, were used to optimise LSB substitution (Maity and Kundu, 2009;Dadgostar and Afsari, 2016).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2018 ). Learning methods, for example, were used to optimize LSB substitution (Maity and Kundu 2009 ; Dadgostar and Afsari 2016 ).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference lies in the usage of DWT for signal decomposition. We use two biorthogonal wavelet filters (6,8) and (4,4) for the experimentation, although other biorthogonal wavelets can also be used.…”
Section: Watermark Embeddingmentioning
confidence: 99%