2017
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.611.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Analysis in Pearl Millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L) R. Br.]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the traits days to 50 % flowering, plant height and days to maturity, out of three female lines, one line ICMA 93333 was considered as a good general combiner and three testers viz., BIB 193, BIB 186 and BIB 281 were good general combiner for days to maturity and days to 50% flowering but for PH BIB 180, BIB 212 and BIB 241 showed significant positive gca effect (Table 3). These results were comparable with the findings of Kumar et al (2017) and Krishnan et al (2017) who 212 for ear head diameter (Patel et al,2018) and BIB 241 and BIB 283 for seed yield per plant (Kumar et al, 2017) showed positive significant gca effects and hence, can be used as a good combiner (Table 3). to flowering (Sushir et al, 2005;Kumar et al,2017), five crosses for days to maturity (Sushir et al, 2005;Bhanderi et al, 2007), one (Kanfany et al, 2018) and three crosses (Rathore et al,2004;Kumar et al, 2017) for plant height with negative and positive sca effect, respectively, three (Kanfany et al, 2018) and three crosses (Rathore et al, 2004;Kumar et al, 2017 andKanfany et al, 2018) for the number of tillers with negative and positive sca effect, respectively, one cross for ear head length (Krishnan et al, 2017), four crosses for test weight (Kumar et al, 2017 andKrishnan et al, 2017) and harvest index (Kumar et al, 2017), seven crosses for biological yield (Krishnan et al, 2017) and nine crosses for seed yield (Sushir et al, 2005;Kumar et al, 2017;Kanfany et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the traits days to 50 % flowering, plant height and days to maturity, out of three female lines, one line ICMA 93333 was considered as a good general combiner and three testers viz., BIB 193, BIB 186 and BIB 281 were good general combiner for days to maturity and days to 50% flowering but for PH BIB 180, BIB 212 and BIB 241 showed significant positive gca effect (Table 3). These results were comparable with the findings of Kumar et al (2017) and Krishnan et al (2017) who 212 for ear head diameter (Patel et al,2018) and BIB 241 and BIB 283 for seed yield per plant (Kumar et al, 2017) showed positive significant gca effects and hence, can be used as a good combiner (Table 3). to flowering (Sushir et al, 2005;Kumar et al,2017), five crosses for days to maturity (Sushir et al, 2005;Bhanderi et al, 2007), one (Kanfany et al, 2018) and three crosses (Rathore et al,2004;Kumar et al, 2017) for plant height with negative and positive sca effect, respectively, three (Kanfany et al, 2018) and three crosses (Rathore et al, 2004;Kumar et al, 2017 andKanfany et al, 2018) for the number of tillers with negative and positive sca effect, respectively, one cross for ear head length (Krishnan et al, 2017), four crosses for test weight (Kumar et al, 2017 andKrishnan et al, 2017) and harvest index (Kumar et al, 2017), seven crosses for biological yield (Krishnan et al, 2017) and nine crosses for seed yield (Sushir et al, 2005;Kumar et al, 2017;Kanfany et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Therefore, in the present study, standard heterosis was estimated for various characters over best check hybrid HHB 67 (Table 5). In the present study, a significant heterosis effect in the desirable direction (positive for all the traits except Days to 50 % flowering, days to maturity and plant height) was reported such as eleven crosses for days to 50 % flowering (Sheoran and Govila,1996;Karad andHarer, 2005 andYadav,2006) and nine crosses (Rathore et al, 2004;Kumar et al, 2017) for plant height (Kanfany et al, 2018), three (Kanfany et al,2018) and three crosses for the number of tillers (Chittora and Patel, 2017) and Bhasker et al,2017), one cross for ear head length (Krishnan et al, 2017), one cross for ear head length (Salagarkar et al,2016 andBhasker et al,2017) and harvest index (Singh et al,2015); Nandaniya et al,2016) and Chittora and Patel (2017), three crosses for biological yield (Singh et al,2015 andKanfany et al, 2018) and seed yield (Chittora and Patel, 2017;Bhasker et al, 2017;Kanfany et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among 49 hybrids, fourteen hybrids displayed notable positive specific combining ability impacts on grain yield per plant. Previous significant GCA and SCA impacts in pearl millet for grain yield and component characteristics were also documented by Reshma Krishnan et al (2017) [20] , Davda and Dangaria (2018) [8] , Sharma et al (2019) [23] , and Patel (2022) [18] . In reference to heterosis over mid parent, superior parent, and standard heterosis, a substantial level of heterosis was observed in the desired direction across all traits.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The variability due to specific combining ability (σ 2 sca ) was five to six times more than variability due to general combining ability (σ 2 gca ) for grain yield and 1000 seed weight and predictability ratio less than 0.5. Earlier studies of Lakshmana et al (2010), Reshma Krishnan et al (2017) and Warrier et al (2019) also reported similar influence of non‐additive gene action for grain yield and 1000 seed weight. The promising combiners identified for rancidity and other characters under study are presented in Table 9a.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%