2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic analysis of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease in Denmark and the implementation of a next generation sequencing platform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
17
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
17
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have shown that NGS panels are technically robust in terms of coverage and read depth and have reported rates of molecular diagnosis in inherited neuropathies ranging from 6% to 46%. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] The differences in the diagnostic rate in these studies both between each other and compared to ours may be explained by the differences in the specific features of the cohorts being tested coming from general neurology, genetic or specialized inherited neuropathy clinics, the number of demyelinating CMT cases enrolled, and the variable exclusion of more common causative genes by previous MLPA and Sanger sequencing. As opposed to demyelinating cases, over 70% of axonal CMT cases remain genetically unconfirmed after NGS panel testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have shown that NGS panels are technically robust in terms of coverage and read depth and have reported rates of molecular diagnosis in inherited neuropathies ranging from 6% to 46%. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] The differences in the diagnostic rate in these studies both between each other and compared to ours may be explained by the differences in the specific features of the cohorts being tested coming from general neurology, genetic or specialized inherited neuropathy clinics, the number of demyelinating CMT cases enrolled, and the variable exclusion of more common causative genes by previous MLPA and Sanger sequencing. As opposed to demyelinating cases, over 70% of axonal CMT cases remain genetically unconfirmed after NGS panel testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…[10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Nevertheless, there are limited data on the effect of targeted NGS panels on the genetic diagnosis of CMT in everyday clinical practice. [17][18][19][20] This study describes the effect of targeted NGS panels on the molecular diagnosis of CMT and related disorders in routine clinical practice in 2 specialized clinics in different health systems in the United Kingdom (London) and United States (Iowa).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PMP22 duplication/deletion mutations, accounting for 23.3% of demyelinating CMT in Japan,8 were not involved in this study and were removed from the original data of previous studies to facilitate comparison. Consequently, we found that three genes, GJB1 , MFN2 , and MPZ , were the leading reasons in the present study, using data from Germany,9 USA,10 UK,11 Norway12 and Denmark13 studies; however, these results differ from previous reports from Japan,8 Spain,14Italy,15 Korea16 and a cross-country study 17. Particularly, in the other Japanese study,8 regarding other genes with mutation frequency higher than 1%, PMP22 (3.3%), NEFL (2.7%) and PRX (1.7%) have been reported, whereas we detected HSPB1 (1.4%) and PMP22 (1.3%) in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…CMT shows considerable genetic heterogeneity. To date, variants in more than 80 genes have been shown to cause CMT [5]. CMT type 1 is characterized by decreased motor nerve conduction velocities (< 38 m/s), sensory loss, progressive muscle weakness, distal limb atrophy and myelin defects [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%