2008
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Analysis of Human Traits In Vitro: Drug Response and Gene Expression in Lymphoblastoid Cell Lines

Abstract: Lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs), originally collected as renewable sources of DNA, are now being used as a model system to study genotype–phenotype relationships in human cells, including searches for QTLs influencing levels of individual mRNAs and responses to drugs and radiation. In the course of attempting to map genes for drug response using 269 LCLs from the International HapMap Project, we evaluated the extent to which biological noise and non-genetic confounders contribute to trait variability in LCLs.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
251
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(262 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
10
251
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several lines of evidence suggest that our desire to biologically control eQTL analysis was successful. The cis-eQTLs were highly reproducible in the biological replicates based on simple power calculations accounting for effect size detected in one replicate, suggesting that, even if cell culture-induced confounders play a role in gene expression of individual lines (Choy et al 2008), the detected cis-eQTLs are true down to P < 10 À5 level. Consequently, significant improvement in detection of cis-eQTLs was achieved by combining the data from independent replicates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several lines of evidence suggest that our desire to biologically control eQTL analysis was successful. The cis-eQTLs were highly reproducible in the biological replicates based on simple power calculations accounting for effect size detected in one replicate, suggesting that, even if cell culture-induced confounders play a role in gene expression of individual lines (Choy et al 2008), the detected cis-eQTLs are true down to P < 10 À5 level. Consequently, significant improvement in detection of cis-eQTLs was achieved by combining the data from independent replicates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although eQTL studies in tissues may better represent disease physiology, the cell specificity of cis-regulation indicates that in heterogeneous tissues the genotype-expression correlations are confounded and large samples may be needed to pinpoint the true causal variants. However, even in cell models, nongenetic confounders can be significant as demonstrated in a recent study using the HapMap LCL samples showing that biological noise and in vitro artifacts can explain much of the population variation in gene expression (Choy et al 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this apparent discrepancy may be that the previous study used replicate arrays and thus may have had more statistical power to find subtle differences; or it may be because we only called heritable any probe set that was similar between parents and offspring (narrow-sense heritability), whereas they considered all differences between two cell lines (broad-sense heritability). Differences between cell lines such as those due, for example, to different Epstein-Barr virus titers or other in vitro artifacts (Choy et al 2008) not inherited from parents would thus be included in their list, but not in ours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Associations between gene expression and genotype (eQTLs) have been established for many nuclear genes. 8,9,[43][44][45][46] We hypothesized that the expression variation of mtDNA genes may be associated with genotypes defined by autosomal SNPs, although the regulatory mechanisms through which these SNPs might affect mtDNA gene expression is not clear. Because all SNPs in mtDNA were of low frequency (MAFo10%), no cis-acting mitochondrial eQTLs (ie, the expression-controlling SNPs located in mtDNA) could be detected.…”
Section: Effects Of Subcellular Co-localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%