1965
DOI: 10.1017/s0016672300004274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic analysis of liver catalase activity in two substrains of C57BL mice

Abstract: The level of liver catalase activity in substrain C57BL/6 mice is only approximately half that in substrain C57BL/He. That this difference was due to a single major gene with low level of activity dominant to high was indicated by analysis of the F1, F2, and backcross hybrids and confirmed by progeny tests of first back-cross male segregants. The gene symbol Ce is suggested.The absence of any difference between reciprocal hybrids indicated no extra-chromosomal maternal influence.There was no evidence that this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis was performed in two steps; first, for each % suppression value the likelihood (predictive density) that a UV suppression value belonged to each genotypic group separately was computed, using the mean and standard deviation of the group; predictive densities were calculated as follows (Geisser 1964;Heston et al 1%5): E where z is the UV % suppression value, N1, RI, and Sl are the sample stze, mean, and standard deviation, respectively, for the genotypic group G,. ~Ihe predictive density for each UV suppression value was then combined with the a priori genetic probability of a segregating class to obtain the probability (posterior probability) that the UV-suppression value belonged to a specific genotypic group and segregating class; posterior probabilities were calculated as follows (Geisser 1964;Heston et al 1965): , 8~, c,) q,f (z/z,, 8,, c,) t where ql is the a priori probability of a segregation class and Eqi = 1. High and low UV % suppression cut-off values were set where the likelihood ratios of posterior probabilities were maximum for each genotypic group.…”
Section: Contact Sensitization Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis was performed in two steps; first, for each % suppression value the likelihood (predictive density) that a UV suppression value belonged to each genotypic group separately was computed, using the mean and standard deviation of the group; predictive densities were calculated as follows (Geisser 1964;Heston et al 1%5): E where z is the UV % suppression value, N1, RI, and Sl are the sample stze, mean, and standard deviation, respectively, for the genotypic group G,. ~Ihe predictive density for each UV suppression value was then combined with the a priori genetic probability of a segregating class to obtain the probability (posterior probability) that the UV-suppression value belonged to a specific genotypic group and segregating class; posterior probabilities were calculated as follows (Geisser 1964;Heston et al 1965): , 8~, c,) q,f (z/z,, 8,, c,) t where ql is the a priori probability of a segregation class and Eqi = 1. High and low UV % suppression cut-off values were set where the likelihood ratios of posterior probabilities were maximum for each genotypic group.…”
Section: Contact Sensitization Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liver catalase activity in the above strains follows a similar distribution with the exception that C57BL/ An and C57BL/He exhibit higher enzyme activities than the other C57BL sublines [4].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Quantitative differences in liver catalase activity (EC 1.11.1.6) for two substrains of inbred mice were found by Heston et al [4] to be under single gene control. In that study a phenotopic range of enzyme activity was correlated with a single genotype.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…At the subcellular level, brain catalase-like activity is largely associated with the microperoxisomes (Gaunt and DeDuve, 1976;Novikoff and Novikoff, 1973). (4) There is considerable evidence of functionally important natural variations in both the expression and structure of Cas1 (Reimer et al, 1994); notably the B6 inbred mouse strain is a low catalase activity variant (Heston et al, 1965). At least for liver catalase, Ganshow and Schimke (1969) concluded that the difference in catalase activity between the B6 and C3H strain was not the result of a difference in gene expression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%