2016
DOI: 10.1007/s13277-016-5057-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic analysis of radiation-specific biomarkers in sinonasal squamous cell carcinomas

Abstract: The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in the gene expression profiles of radiation-sensitive (RS) and radiation-resistant (RR) sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC) and to identify prognostic markers for the radiation reaction of SNSCC. We first examined the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in RS and RR SNSCC tissues by analyzing clinical samples with GeneChip Human Transcriptome Array 2.0 (HTA 2.0).To understand the functional significance of the molecular changes, we examined the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, mostly conventional analytical approaches have been used for radiation biomarker discovery building on differentially expressed gene (DEG) profiles, which poses critical limitations on throughput, sensitivity, and specificity (11). ML has emerged in radiation oncology and medicals physics as a technology to overcome these limitations, but its application to radiation biomarker screening and basic radiation biology is underexplored (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19). Early implementation of ML approaches into radiation biomarker discovery workflows can be of tremendous benefit to the field: ML-based frameworks can vastly reduce the analytical time burden for researchers, increase analytical certainty (accuracy) through improved specificity and sensitivity, and help establish consensus guidelines for sample and data acquisition, such as group size, replicates, batch effects, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, mostly conventional analytical approaches have been used for radiation biomarker discovery building on differentially expressed gene (DEG) profiles, which poses critical limitations on throughput, sensitivity, and specificity (11). ML has emerged in radiation oncology and medicals physics as a technology to overcome these limitations, but its application to radiation biomarker screening and basic radiation biology is underexplored (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19). Early implementation of ML approaches into radiation biomarker discovery workflows can be of tremendous benefit to the field: ML-based frameworks can vastly reduce the analytical time burden for researchers, increase analytical certainty (accuracy) through improved specificity and sensitivity, and help establish consensus guidelines for sample and data acquisition, such as group size, replicates, batch effects, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%