2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-011-1568-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic analysis of the sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) cultivar ‘LCP 85-384’. I. Linkage mapping using AFLP, SSR, and TRAP markers

Abstract: Sugarcane hybrids are complex aneu-polyploids (2n = 100-130) derived from inter-specific hybridization between ancestral polyploid species, namely S. officinarum L. and S. spontaneum L. Efforts to understand the sugarcane genome have recently been enhanced through the use of new molecular marker technologies. A framework genetic linkage map of Louisiana's popular cultivar LCP 85-384 was constructed using the selfed progeny and based on polymorphism derived from 64 AFLP, 19 SSR and 12 TRAP primer pairs. Of 1,11… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
50
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…accessions, the use of molecular markers such as AFLPs (Andru et al, 2011) will be necessary as it was the case for many crops such as fonio (Adoukonou et al, 2007), wheat (Altintas et al, 2008), yam (Sonibare et al, 2010) and rice (Rajkumar et al, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…accessions, the use of molecular markers such as AFLPs (Andru et al, 2011) will be necessary as it was the case for many crops such as fonio (Adoukonou et al, 2007), wheat (Altintas et al, 2008), yam (Sonibare et al, 2010) and rice (Rajkumar et al, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, phenotypic traits usually do not reflect the true level of diversity among sugarcane germplasm due to severe influence by environmental factors (Creste et al 2010;Singh et al 2010). To obtain reliable data to distinguish the genetic diversity among breeding lines in programs, DNA markers have also been used, including AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism) (Aitken et al 2006;Besse et al 1998), RFLP (restriction fragment length polymorphism) (Creste et al 2010), RAPD (random amplification polymorphism DNA) (Da Nawaz et al 2010;Ramakrishnan et al 2015), SRAP (sequence-related amplified polymorphism) (Alwala et al 2008;Chang et al 2012), SCoT (start codon targeted) (Que et al 2014), SSR (simple sequence repeat) Andru et al 2011;Cai et al 2005;Nayak et al 2014;Xu et al 1999;Zawedde et al 2014), ISSR (inter simple sequence repeat) (Alves de Almeida et al 2009;Devarumath et al 2012), and EST (expressed sequences tags)-SSR Singh et al 2013). Among these markers, SSR markers are highly informative, simple to use with reliable results (Senior et al 1998;Smith et al 1997), and have been widely applied to sugarcane Pan 2010;Pan et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LCP 85-384 chromosomes confirmed the high incidence of bivalent pairing among homologous chromosomes in this hybrid. Repulsion phase linkages found among three or more markers in some linkage groups are suggestive of disomic inheritance or preferential pairing of chromosomes in LCP 85-384 (Andru et al 2011).…”
Section: Molecular Cytogeneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A linkage map was constructed with 1,111 AFLP, SSR, and TRAP markers, and 108 linkage groups were assigned into nine HGs (Andru et al 2011).…”
Section: Genetic Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%