2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bse.2016.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic and allelopathic differences between populations of daisy fleabane Erigeron annuus (L.) Pers. (Asteraceae) from disturbed and stable habitats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim of the research described in this paper was to assess the extent of the allelopathic effect of Scots pine on the test plant. The plant selected for tests was white mustard (Sinapsis alba L.), proposed previously by others authors as a receiver species (or acceptor, or test plant) (Csiszár 2009;Csiszár et al 2013, Tunaitienë et al 2017. The current research compared the impact of leachates obtained from different Scots pine clones on the test plant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of the research described in this paper was to assess the extent of the allelopathic effect of Scots pine on the test plant. The plant selected for tests was white mustard (Sinapsis alba L.), proposed previously by others authors as a receiver species (or acceptor, or test plant) (Csiszár 2009;Csiszár et al 2013, Tunaitienë et al 2017. The current research compared the impact of leachates obtained from different Scots pine clones on the test plant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirdly, our study demonstrated that habitat differentiation is reflected in the variation and genetic structure of A. aristatum populations occurring at the non-native range limit. These results refer to the oftendiscussed problem of interactions between an alien species and habitats it colonizes beyond its natural range limit (among others, Dietz and Edwards 2006;Riis et al 2010;Erfmeier et al 2011;Pahl et al 2013;Tunaitien_ e et al 2017). Previous studies of plants occurring in habitats differing in use intensity indicate three possible patterns of population genetic diversity:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…(1) plants in disturbed habitats have higher genotypic and genetic diversity than in stable habitats (Koppitz et al 2000;Xie et al 2001;Lambertini et al 2008); (2) there are no significant differences between the genotypic and genetic diversity of populations occurring in habitats with different disturbance regimes (Solé et al 2004); and (3) populations in stable habitats are more differentiated than populations in disturbed habitats (Trtikova et al 2011;Tunaitien_ e et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally , intermediate levels of disturbance improve the genetic diversity of clone plants, providing greater recruitment of new genes into the population (McMahon et al., 2017). However, Tunaitien et al. (2017) found that population diversity parameters of Erigeron annuus did not significantly differ between stable habitats and disturbed regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The influence of disturbance on genetic structure results from the imposed environmental and demographic changes, which are closely related to the species responses to habitat suitability, leading to accelerate its evolutional process (Banks et al., 2013). Therefore, some presumed that genetic differentiation could be associated with founder effects or different selection pressures under disturbed habitats (Tunaitien et al., 2017). The population structure of Ranunculus ficaria under heterogenic habitats provides a good example of the impact of selection pressure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%