“…Yeast media, transformations, RNA isolation, blotting, and hybridization were as described (Scheistl & Geitz 1989;Rose et al+, 1990;Hagan et al+, 1995;Weng et al+, 1996a)+ Strains constructed for this study MTT1 was disrupted from PLY22 (a his4-38 SUF1-1 ura3-52 met14 ) and PLY36 (a his4-38 SUF1-1 ura3-52 met14 upf1-2) to assay for frameshift suppression+ To assay nonsense suppression of leu2-2 and tyr7-1, strain KC2 was created by crossing PLY146 (a ura3-52 leu2-2(UGA) tyr7-1(UAG) trp1 upf1::URA3; Leeds et al+, 1991Leeds et al+, , 1992 with PLY22, selecting diploids on ϪuraϪtrp media, sporulating, and assaying random spores for auxotrophy on Ϫura, Ϫtrp, Ϫleu, and Ϫtyr media independently+ Subsequent analysis of strain KC2 (a ura3-52 leu2-2(UGA) tyr7-1(UAG) trp1 his4-38 met14 ) demonstrated that it also retained the met14 and his4-38 markers, but not SUF1-1. Deletion of UPF1 from KC2 was as described (pKOM; Cui et al+, 1995)+ To disrupt MTT1 (mtt1::hisGURA3hisG), pKOMTT1 was digested with PvuII and transformed into yeast+ To confirm the knockout of MTT1, genomic DNA was digested with XhoI and a 2+2-kb XhoIXbaI probe fragment was excised from pUC19MTT1+ Wildtype MTT1 gives a 20-kb genomic fragment, whereas mtt1::hisGURA3hisG gives an ;6+2-kb fragment+ After selection on 5-FOA to remove hisGURA3 (mtt1::hisG), the probe yields an ;3+5-kb fragment+…”