2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.03.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic and dopaminergic modulation of reversal learning in a touchscreen-based operant procedure for mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
96
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
9
96
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are few D1 agonists or antagonists with sufficient selectivity for use in human subjects, and ours is the first study to examine the effects of a D1 antagonist on reversal learning in the non-human primate. We find that SCH23390 failed to impair performance; however, in mice, the D1-like receptor agonist SKF81297 was reported to impair reversal learning, using an automated touch-screen procedure (Izquierdo et al, 2006). In essence, it is possible that subphysiological activation of D1-like receptors by DA does not affect reversal learning, whereas supra-normal stimulation does.…”
Section: -Like Receptor Mechanisms In Executive Functionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…There are few D1 agonists or antagonists with sufficient selectivity for use in human subjects, and ours is the first study to examine the effects of a D1 antagonist on reversal learning in the non-human primate. We find that SCH23390 failed to impair performance; however, in mice, the D1-like receptor agonist SKF81297 was reported to impair reversal learning, using an automated touch-screen procedure (Izquierdo et al, 2006). In essence, it is possible that subphysiological activation of D1-like receptors by DA does not affect reversal learning, whereas supra-normal stimulation does.…”
Section: -Like Receptor Mechanisms In Executive Functionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Mice were trained to discriminate between 2 novel stimuli presented in a spatially pseudorandomized manner over 30-trial sessions, with the correct vs incorrect designation switched for reversal training (64,65).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These measures are known to be dependent on the prefrontal cortex across multiple species including humans, non-human primates and rats (Robbins, 2000;Brown and Bowman, 2002;Royall et al 2002;Miller et al 2002), and while studies in mice have thus been less expansive, the literature available to date suggests at least a functional homology to rats in equivalent cognitive tests (Lidow et al 2003;Greco et al 2005;Izquierdo et al 2006). In addition to these prefrontal-related tasks, two measures of hippocampal-dependent learning were included to help clarify previous conflicting findings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%