DOI: 10.31274/rtd-180813-979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic and environmental effects on body measurements in broiler chickens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of the apparent significant increase of BW 1 for selected line compared to control in G 4 and G 5 were supported by Dunnington and Sigel (1985) who found that the greater effect of selection had been observed for breast angle in later studied generations. Moreover, Abou EL-Ghar and Ragaa (2016) found the same results of body weight increase at 12-wk of age for selected line compared to control,whereas, Merritt (1958) found that selection for breast width after four generation had no significant influence on body weight. Referring to the increase of BC for the selected line compared to the control among studied generations, Ragaa and Ashour (2014) came to the same outcome.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Results of the apparent significant increase of BW 1 for selected line compared to control in G 4 and G 5 were supported by Dunnington and Sigel (1985) who found that the greater effect of selection had been observed for breast angle in later studied generations. Moreover, Abou EL-Ghar and Ragaa (2016) found the same results of body weight increase at 12-wk of age for selected line compared to control,whereas, Merritt (1958) found that selection for breast width after four generation had no significant influence on body weight. Referring to the increase of BC for the selected line compared to the control among studied generations, Ragaa and Ashour (2014) came to the same outcome.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Variance component estimates of farm or location effects on broiler weight of approximately 10 percent were found by Merritt and Gowe (1956) and Merritt (1957). Lonsdale et al (l957) found that debeaking at day-old by removing one-third of the maxilla and mandible, in four trials consistently retarded growth to 10 weeks although not significantly so.…”
Section: Growthmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Ghostley (1955) noted a downward trend in 8 week weight as the hatching season progressed. Goodman and God frey ( 1954) attributed 11 percent of the total variation in 9 week weight to hatch effect, but Merritt (1957) obtained estimates close to zero in chickens of both sexes at 12 weeks of age.…”
Section: Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%