2020
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy10030332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic and Environmental Predictors for Determining Optimal Seeding Rates of Diverse Wheat Cultivars

Abstract: Seeding rate for maximum grain yield can differ for diverse hard red spring wheat (HRSW) (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars and is derived from a yield response curve to seeding rates. Six groups of HRSW cultivars with combinations of Rht-B, Rht-D, and Ppd-D genes were planted at five seeding rates in 21 environments during 2013–2015 throughout Minnesota and eastern North Dakota, USA. Seeding rates ranged from 1.59 to 5.55 million seeds ha−1 and planting timings were optimal and delayed dates. An analysis of cov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Planting dates within environments had differing yield responses, so data from each planting date were partitioned into high (>5000 kg ha −1 ) and low (<5000 kg ha −1 ) yielding environment datasets by considering individual planting dates as a single environment for a total of nine environments similar to Mehring et al [52]. Yield within an environment was evaluated by standardizing the distribution of each, using z-scores.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Planting dates within environments had differing yield responses, so data from each planting date were partitioned into high (>5000 kg ha −1 ) and low (<5000 kg ha −1 ) yielding environment datasets by considering individual planting dates as a single environment for a total of nine environments similar to Mehring et al [52]. Yield within an environment was evaluated by standardizing the distribution of each, using z-scores.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wheat yield components are considered plastic and compensate for one another and their relative contributions to yield may vary in high or low yielding environments. Therefore, the data were separated into four high (>5000 kg ha −1 ) and five low (<5000 kg ha −1 ) yield environments, similar to Mehring et al [52]. The environments ranged from 5202 to 5923 and 3846 to 4633 kg ha −1 for high and low yield environments, respectively.…”
Section: Yield Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wheat grain yield consists of four components, plant density, spikes per plant, kernels per spike and kernel weight (Slafer et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2003). Plant density is primarily driven by seeding rate, but final plant density achieved is also influenced by growing season conditions such as moisture and pest pressure (Mehring et al., 2020). Wheat will compensate for low plant stands by producing additional stems per plant, called tillers, to capitalize on resources and space available (Bastos et al., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After these new cultivars are subsequently tested in multi-year seeding rate studies, the actual OSR can greatly differ from the original extension recommendation. These differences can reveal 2 + years of reduced yields and economic losses due to genotype x management (GxM) interactions (Mehring et al, 2020). Although this reinforces the importance of proper seeding rate selection, with the continued release of new cultivars (and discontinuation of older cultivars), determining OSR for each cultivar is expensive, time-consuming, and repetitive research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods of splitting of datasets can be used to minimize these errors when conducting statistical analyses (Crowley, 1992). A prior HRSW seeding rate study conducted in ND and MN produced regression models predictive for grain yield by dividing the original dataset into two subsets (Mehring et al, 2020). This method represents the validation set approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%