1973
DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(73)90188-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic and phenotypic variation in weight of brain and spinal cord between inbred strains of mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
1

Year Published

1975
1975
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Strain differences in brain sizes reported in this study are notably similar to those reported previously by Roderick and colleagues [13] and Williams [26], although some striking differences are apparent. For example, strain PL/J had an average brain weight of 0.506 g in the present study and 0.516 g in the Roderick study but 0.433 g in the Williams data (www.mbl.org), whereas the three studies found similar brain weights for C57BL/6J (0.495 g here, 0.489 for Roderick, and 0.482 for Williams).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Strain differences in brain sizes reported in this study are notably similar to those reported previously by Roderick and colleagues [13] and Williams [26], although some striking differences are apparent. For example, strain PL/J had an average brain weight of 0.506 g in the present study and 0.516 g in the Roderick study but 0.433 g in the Williams data (www.mbl.org), whereas the three studies found similar brain weights for C57BL/6J (0.495 g here, 0.489 for Roderick, and 0.482 for Williams).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In a mouse with a mild reduction in size of the whole animal, it is not normal to see reduction in brain size [32,36]. In fact, whereas the cerebellar regions in frc mice were not different from controls, the cerebrum and olfactory regions of the fierce brain were disproportionately reduced (Fig.…”
Section: Fierce Mice Have Abnormal Brain Developmentmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Methods of fixation were very similar in the Williams (16) study, and the correlation of Edmonton data with their strain means was very high (r ϭ 0.88). The two older studies (17,18) both weighed unfixed brains, and fresh brain weights are expected to be slightly larger than fixed brain weights, but there is no reason to expect major strain-dependent differences in shrinkage (19).The similarity between the Edmonton data and the Roderick et al…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%