2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0409-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic and transcriptional evolution alters cancer cell line drug response

Abstract: Human cancer cell lines are the workhorse of cancer research. Although cell lines are known to evolve in culture, the extent of the resultant genetic and transcriptional heterogeneity and its functional consequences remain understudied. Here we use genomic analyses of 106 human cell lines grown in two laboratories to show extensive clonal diversity. Further comprehensive genomic characterization of 27 strains of the common breast cancer cell line MCF7 uncovered rapid genetic diversification. Similar results we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

42
672
2
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 715 publications
(759 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
42
672
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess whether these observations are due to alterations in ER chromatin binding in KDM5IR cells, we performed ER ChIP-seq before and after E2 stimulation. MCF7 cells cultured in estrogen-depleted conditions had very few ER binding peaks with a dramatic increase 45 min after E2 stimulation (Figure 4G), which is consistent with previous studies (Figure S4G), although, as expected, some variability was observed among different batches of MCF7 cells (Ben-David et al, 2018). In contrast, in KDM5IR cells a subset of ER binding peaks (cluster 1) was present even in estrogen-depleted conditions and increased to a much higher level after E2-treatment than what was observed in parental cells (Figure 4G).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…To assess whether these observations are due to alterations in ER chromatin binding in KDM5IR cells, we performed ER ChIP-seq before and after E2 stimulation. MCF7 cells cultured in estrogen-depleted conditions had very few ER binding peaks with a dramatic increase 45 min after E2 stimulation (Figure 4G), which is consistent with previous studies (Figure S4G), although, as expected, some variability was observed among different batches of MCF7 cells (Ben-David et al, 2018). In contrast, in KDM5IR cells a subset of ER binding peaks (cluster 1) was present even in estrogen-depleted conditions and increased to a much higher level after E2-treatment than what was observed in parental cells (Figure 4G).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, the use of iPSC‐ECs for developing patient‐specific in vitro models can encourage further investigations that clarify these differences. [ 68 ] Therefore, the here‐proposed methodology could contribute toward a better understanding of disease‐specific transport processes and signaling molecular pathways, potentially leading to the discovery of new targets and candidate membrane transporters to enable improved drug delivery across the BBB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found that chrysophanol had little effect on breast cancer cell lines (MCF‐7, T47D) and colon cancer cell line (HCT‐116) . In view of the huge differences in the apoptosis of the same cancer cells (HepG2 cells) induced by chrysophanol, based on the literature review, we believe that in the case of eliminating human error and differences of experimental conditions, it may be the different degrees of genetic variation occurred in the process of subculture of the same type of cancer cells in the laboratory . Next, the researchers investigated the mechanism of chrysophanol‐induced apoptosis in cancer cells.…”
Section: Pharmacologymentioning
confidence: 99%