2016
DOI: 10.1080/09064702.2016.1260153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic associations of teat cup attachment failures, incomplete milkings, and handling time in automatic milking systems with milkability, temperament, and udder conformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
30
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
30
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the same study, genetic parameters of handling time (HT; defined as time in AMS before and after milking) in minutes were investigated. The estimated heritability for handling time was 0.15 for Swedish Reds and 0.05 for Swedish Holsteins; a strong genetic association between subjectively scored temperament and teat cup KO in AMS was also found (Carlström et al, 2016). Temperament in Swedish Reds scored subjectively on a 9-point scale showed a genetic correlation of −0.71 with KO traits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the same study, genetic parameters of handling time (HT; defined as time in AMS before and after milking) in minutes were investigated. The estimated heritability for handling time was 0.15 for Swedish Reds and 0.05 for Swedish Holsteins; a strong genetic association between subjectively scored temperament and teat cup KO in AMS was also found (Carlström et al, 2016). Temperament in Swedish Reds scored subjectively on a 9-point scale showed a genetic correlation of −0.71 with KO traits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Some studies investigated the use of AMS records as objective measurements of behavioral traits (Rinell et al, 2014;Carlström et al, 2016;Stephansen et al, 2018). Teat cup KO in AMS were found to be genetically related to cows' milking temperament.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study showed that h 2 was larger for CT compared with log_nApT; however, the genetic correlation between FAT and log_nApT was slightly larger than the correlation between FAT and CT. In 3 AMS studies, the h 2 for milking temperament was estimated to be in the range from 0.05 to 0.31 using data from DeLaval AMS (Bakke, 2014;Rinell et al, 2014;Carlström et al, 2016). Rinell et al (2014) estimated h 2 for proportion of attachment failures (0.31) in multiparous Holstein cows.…”
Section: Milking Temperamentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Nordic Cattle Genetic Evaluation, a h 2 of 0.13 is used when estimating breeding values for the temperament trait in Danish Holstein (SEGES Cattle, 2015-2016. However, this trait is assessed by farmers and is a subjective assessment of the individual cow's behavior at milking and handling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%