2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic characterization of four Algerian goat breeds assessed by microsatellite markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
18
7

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
18
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the obtained average PE value (0.635), which is known as a measure of efficiency in paternity testing, was in the probability of exclusion with some literature (20,22), it was higher than values obtained from other studies (19). This may have been due to the differences in microsatellite loci used in these studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the obtained average PE value (0.635), which is known as a measure of efficiency in paternity testing, was in the probability of exclusion with some literature (20,22), it was higher than values obtained from other studies (19). This may have been due to the differences in microsatellite loci used in these studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Obtained MNa and PIC values were significantly higher than those of some other Turkish goat breeds and other goat breeds raised in different countries (17,18), while these values were lower than those of goat breeds raised in North Africa (19). The findings related to allele numbers indicated a high level of allelic richness in the breed studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Although lower than H E (0.74), this value of H O is similar to that reported for other Italian or foreign breeds [40,41,44]. Higher H E values were reported in other cases [20,37,38]. The presence of private alleles (i.e., alleles present in one breed and absent in the others) were observed in all three populations/breeds, but were about 5-fold more abundant in FAC (25 in FAC, 4 in CAM and 5 in SAA).…”
Section: Genetic Variationsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…After adopting the rarefaction methodology [24], the mean allelic richness ranged from 4.36 (CAM) to 5.17 (FAC) in a sample size of eight individuals. Lower allelic diversity was found in many local goat breeds [37][38][39][40], but higher MNA values were reported in both Italian [41][42][43] and foreign [20,44] breeds. FAC had higher observed heterozygosity compared to the cosmopolitan breeds, with H O of 0.68.…”
Section: Genetic Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation