2023
DOI: 10.1111/mms.13053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic data reveal wintering ground affiliation of humpback whales from the Mexican Central Pacific

Myriam Llamas‐González,
Christian D. Ortega‐Ortiz,
Luis M. Enríquez‐Paredes
et al.

Abstract: Two groups of humpback whales inhabit the waters off the Pacific coast of Mexico the coastal wintering aggregation in the north (MX), and the southern Mexico/Central America wintering aggregation (S‐MX/CEA) in the south. However, along the coast of the Mexican Central Pacific (MCP), the population affiliation of humpback whales is uncertain. Some studies have concluded that the MCP whales are part of S‐MX/CEA, while others have suggested that the MCP may represent an overlap zone between the two wintering aggr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These subset models could not be considered absolute abundance estimations because each 3-year sample was not assumed to be a closed population or controlled for sample bias such as, in the case of Mainland Mexico, an overlap of Central American whales. These whales are known to co-occur using the region as a migratory corridor [ 46 , 76 ], and therefore the subset abundance estimate sampled a population with undefined boundaries. In Hawai‘i, sample effort was concentrated in the Maui-Nui channel and to lesser extents off the islands of Hawai‘i, Oahu and Kauai, without a clear definition of whether this is a comprehensive sample of an equally mixed Hawaiian island population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These subset models could not be considered absolute abundance estimations because each 3-year sample was not assumed to be a closed population or controlled for sample bias such as, in the case of Mainland Mexico, an overlap of Central American whales. These whales are known to co-occur using the region as a migratory corridor [ 46 , 76 ], and therefore the subset abundance estimate sampled a population with undefined boundaries. In Hawai‘i, sample effort was concentrated in the Maui-Nui channel and to lesser extents off the islands of Hawai‘i, Oahu and Kauai, without a clear definition of whether this is a comprehensive sample of an equally mixed Hawaiian island population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%