2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11105-018-1101-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Differentiation and Adaptability of Teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) Meta-Population in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings emphasise the need for acquiring teak provenances from areas of its original distribution that are high in genetic diversity and are not in the present provenance trial, one such area being South-West India (Hansen et al, 2017) and the semi-moist east coast of India (Hansen et al, 2015). The analysis of Vaishnav and Ansari (2018) indicates that genetic resources in India may be a source for screening resilient superior provenances for improvement strategies for sustainable production of quality timber on a large scale. Various examples exist for the benefit of matching specific provenances to specific local conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Our findings emphasise the need for acquiring teak provenances from areas of its original distribution that are high in genetic diversity and are not in the present provenance trial, one such area being South-West India (Hansen et al, 2017) and the semi-moist east coast of India (Hansen et al, 2015). The analysis of Vaishnav and Ansari (2018) indicates that genetic resources in India may be a source for screening resilient superior provenances for improvement strategies for sustainable production of quality timber on a large scale. Various examples exist for the benefit of matching specific provenances to specific local conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…It indicates that the approach avoiding null alleles have controlled the informativeness of the primers helping genetic differentiation (Lynch & Milligan 1994). The AF exhibited by the RAPD/ISSR markers are slightly higher to the information resulted in populations of Tectona grandis L. f. sampled from India on ISSR markers (0.73±0.02, Vaishnav & Ansari 2018). On the other hand, negligible differences in AF among the markers of RAPD and ISSR systems ensure the qualitative support for the diversity assessment (Lynch & Milligan 1994, Nybom & Bartish 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Among the various molecular markers employed to assess diversity studies, PCR-based dominant markers such as RAPD (random amplified polymorphic DNA, Williams et al 1990) and ISSR (inter-simple sequence repeat, Zietkiewiez et al 1994) have become popular due to its polymorphism and discrimination power, as their application does not need any prior sequence information. These primer systems have been successfully applied for the genetic characterization of populations of tropical tree species (Ansari et al 2012, Abuduli et al 2016, Vaishnav & Ansari 2018). Bayesian statistics has been extended to dominant markers for precise estimates of population genetic hierarchies equivalent to those obtained with codominant markers, circumventing inbreeding estimate within the population (Holsinger et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence the adaptive fitness of the species led by the population genetic characteristics was determined to ensure the sustainability and genomic resilience of the population through dominant AFLP markers. The dominant markers have already been applied to confirm the adaptive fitness of trees 28,29 and other plant species [30][31][32] . In the present study also, a high MAF (0.65 ± 0.02) of the AFLP markers and a high LD decay (1.99%) in loci-combinations supported their suitability for high-resolution GWAS 33 confirming their frequent coverage of the species genome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%