2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-020-6746-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic differentiation and intrinsic genomic features explain variation in recombination hotspots among cocoa tree populations

Abstract: Background Recombination plays an important evolutionary role by breaking up haplotypes and shuffling genetic variation. This process impacts the ability of selection to eliminate deleterious mutations or increase the frequency of beneficial mutations in a population. To understand the role of recombination generating and maintaining haplotypic variation in a population, we can construct fine-scale recombination maps. Such maps have been used to study a variety of model organisms and proven to be informative o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when calculating the per site recombination rate to account for effective population size, KES had an average recombination rate that was an order of magnitude larger than the other populations. As demonstrated within previous studies, populations with a small effective population size may exhibit higher recombination rates associated to an increase accumulation of deleterious mutations in homogenized genomes (Keightley and Otto 2006; Kumar et al 2019; Schwarzkopf et al 2020). Because KES has had a small historical Ne (~10,000), we hypothesize that the deleterious effects of a low Ne have contributed to a increased overall recombination rates within KES; however, this hypothesis needs to be tested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, when calculating the per site recombination rate to account for effective population size, KES had an average recombination rate that was an order of magnitude larger than the other populations. As demonstrated within previous studies, populations with a small effective population size may exhibit higher recombination rates associated to an increase accumulation of deleterious mutations in homogenized genomes (Keightley and Otto 2006; Kumar et al 2019; Schwarzkopf et al 2020). Because KES has had a small historical Ne (~10,000), we hypothesize that the deleterious effects of a low Ne have contributed to a increased overall recombination rates within KES; however, this hypothesis needs to be tested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Both fine-scale recombination rates and hotspots are poorly conserved across mammals and plants with significant differences even among closely related species (Spencer et al 2006; Choi et al 2016; Beeson et al 2019; Dreissig et al 2019). However, less is known about the onset of variation in recombination rates across diverging populations of the same species (Schwarzkopf et al 2020) and how it impacts patterns of genetic variation. Comparing recombination maps across multiple populations of humans has recently been investigated; however, this question has not been applied to other model systems and was aimed at identifying the impact of demographic changes on the recombination landscape and not how elevated recombination impacts patterns of diversity and divergence (Spencer et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…indica (Marand et al 2019) although they diverged relatively recently (440,000-86,000 years ago (YA); Ma and Bennetzen 2004;Vitte et al 2004;Zhu and Ge 2005;Tang et al 2006). Similarly, analysis of the recombination landscapes in the cocoa-tree (Theobroma cacao) showed only little overlap of recombination hotspots across ten diverging populations with less divergent populations showing higher level of overlap (Schwarzkopf et al 2020). An analysis of the recombination landscapes in wild barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, genetic divergence and structural variations are also influencing recombination rates (Ziolkowski et al ., 2015, 2017; Crown et al ., 2018; Rowan et al ., 2019). At the population level, recombination rates were shown to vary drastically depending on variations in meiotic genes or environmental conditions (Brand et al ., 2018; Dreissig et al ., 2019; Martin et al ., 2019; Samuk et al ., 2019; Schwarzkopf et al ., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%