“…Most QTGs we identified are also new compared to association studies on adventitious shoot regeneration in roses 38 , callus formation in poplar 39 and rice 40 and in vitro regeneration of cucumber 41 and tomato 42 . However, these studies do report similar functional classes of candidates (e.g., embryogenesis and meristem genes, reprogramming factors, hormone-related proteins, receptor-like kinases, and TFs from the LBD, ERF, MYB, and WOX families) 37 – 40 and in cases where multiple traits, protocols or techniques are evaluated, overlap between them is limited 37 , 38 , suggesting that the difference in experimental systems could be part of the cause. Notably, several established SAM genes, epigenetic factors and cell cycle regulators (e.g., STM, CUCs, ESRs, PLTs, WIND1, MET1, and CYCD3 13 ) were not detected in our assay, which might be due to a lack of functional sequence variation at these loci in the tested population 43 .…”