1999
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic divergence and units for conservation in the Komodo dragon Varanus komodoensis

Abstract: In the past decade much attention has focused on the role that genetics can play in the formation of management strategies in conservation. Here, we describe genetic diversity in the world's largest lizard, the Komodo dragon (Varanus komodoensis), examining the evolutionary relationships and population genetic history of the four islands in southeast Indonesia, which form the vast majority of its range. We identify distinct genetic groups for conservation. The population on the island of Komodo shows by far th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
249
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(254 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
249
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We selected the most likely number of clusters given the data by choosing the number of clusters where we observed the largest difference in log likelihoods (DK) (Evanno et al, 2005). Finally, the overall pattern of population genetic structure among regions was assessed with a Bayesian approach developed by Ciofi et al (1999) and implemented in the program 2MOD by MA Beaumont (http://www.rubic.rdg.ac.uk/~mab/software.html). Two models are evaluated: (1) the gene flow model, which assumes that gene frequencies within populations are caused by a balance between genetic drift and gene flow, and (2) the drift model, in which allele frequencies within populations are evolving purely through drift.…”
Section: Patterns Of Population Subdivisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected the most likely number of clusters given the data by choosing the number of clusters where we observed the largest difference in log likelihoods (DK) (Evanno et al, 2005). Finally, the overall pattern of population genetic structure among regions was assessed with a Bayesian approach developed by Ciofi et al (1999) and implemented in the program 2MOD by MA Beaumont (http://www.rubic.rdg.ac.uk/~mab/software.html). Two models are evaluated: (1) the gene flow model, which assumes that gene frequencies within populations are caused by a balance between genetic drift and gene flow, and (2) the drift model, in which allele frequencies within populations are evolving purely through drift.…”
Section: Patterns Of Population Subdivisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the drift model (corresponding to our model 2) it is assumed that an ancestral panmictic population is separated into several independent units which start diverging purely by genetic drift, whereas the gene-flow model assumes that the gene frequencies within subpopulations are determined by a balance between genetic drift and immigration (corresponding to models 3-5). The program uses a coalescent theory and a Markov's chain Monte Carlo simulation approach with Metropolis-Hastings sampling to explore the alternative models, as described in Ciofi et al (1999). Two independent simulations with 100 000 iterations were carried out to check the convergence of the posterior probabilities of the models.…”
Section: Population Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to analyse whether or not there has been any gene flow between the subpopulations, we used the program 2MOD (Ciofi et al 1999) to estimate the relative likelihoods of drift vs. immigration models since a certain time. In the drift model (corresponding to our model 2) it is assumed that an ancestral panmictic population is separated into several independent units which start diverging purely by genetic drift, whereas the gene-flow model assumes that the gene frequencies within subpopulations are determined by a balance between genetic drift and immigration (corresponding to models 3-5).…”
Section: Population Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Demographic history was assessed using BOTTLENECK [31] and MSVAR v. 1.3 [32] with various priors (electronic supplementary material, tables S5 and S6). Evolution under gene flow versus drift was tested with 2MOD [33].…”
Section: (V) Microsatellite Loci Genotyping Of San Cristóbal Marine Imentioning
confidence: 99%