1997
DOI: 10.1086/286036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Divergence in Adaptive Characters Between Sympatric Species of Stickleback

Abstract: This study explored the genetic basis of phenotypic differences between two sympatric species of ecologically and morphologically divergent sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus complex). The aim was to understand how many loci determine the differences and to what extent the differences are due to additive or nonadditive gene action. I reared the two parental species, F1 and F2 hybrids, and both backcrosses in the laboratory and measured the following quantitative characters: gill raker number and length (both… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

10
99
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
10
99
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results corroborate earlier work documenting inbreeding and genetic coadaptation in Drosophila (Wallace 1953;Brnic 1954;Wallace and Vetukhiv 1955;Anderson 1968) and conform to more recent studies using marker assisted techniques (Clegg et al 1978;Cavener and Clegg 1981;Burton 1987Burton , 1990Hard et al 1992Hard et al , 1993Palapoli and Wu 1994;Doebley et al 1995;Lark et al 1995;Rieseberg et al 1995;Armbruster et al 1997;Hatfield 1997;Li et al 1997;Routman and Cheverud 1997) and others (reviewed in Whitlock et al 1995;Fenster et al 1997). Our observation of epistasis contributing to divergence at a very local scale has also been observed in a number of other studies (Templeton et al 1976;Price and Waser 1979;Burton 1987Burton , 1990Waser andPrice 1989, 1994;Parker 1992;Deng and Lynch 1996).…”
Section: Contribution Of Epistasis To Population Genetic Differentiationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our results corroborate earlier work documenting inbreeding and genetic coadaptation in Drosophila (Wallace 1953;Brnic 1954;Wallace and Vetukhiv 1955;Anderson 1968) and conform to more recent studies using marker assisted techniques (Clegg et al 1978;Cavener and Clegg 1981;Burton 1987Burton , 1990Hard et al 1992Hard et al , 1993Palapoli and Wu 1994;Doebley et al 1995;Lark et al 1995;Rieseberg et al 1995;Armbruster et al 1997;Hatfield 1997;Li et al 1997;Routman and Cheverud 1997) and others (reviewed in Whitlock et al 1995;Fenster et al 1997). Our observation of epistasis contributing to divergence at a very local scale has also been observed in a number of other studies (Templeton et al 1976;Price and Waser 1979;Burton 1987Burton , 1990Waser andPrice 1989, 1994;Parker 1992;Deng and Lynch 1996).…”
Section: Contribution Of Epistasis To Population Genetic Differentiationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…To examine the influence of different genetic regions on trophic morphology, we counted the number of both long and short gill rakers on the first gill arch of all progeny from the Priest Lake cross (Figure 3b). No major QTL were found influencing the number of long gill rakers in the cross, consistent with previous biometrical studies suggesting that gill raker number may be based on a large number of genes of small effect 14,15 . In contrast, the number of short gill rakers is influenced by two QTL that map to separate linkage groups.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our study also contributes to the growing body of literature that describes the importance of non-additive gene action for evolutionary processes such as adaptation and speciation [19,43,46]. Our results suggest that higher-order gene interactions may also be important in determining the outcome of hybridization between species in secondary contact, because some of the most important determinants of salamander fitness ( i.e ., survival and Tmet) demonstrated significant non-additive inheritance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Many previous studies have documented phenotypic differences arising from multiple genes acting additively on phenotypic traits [43-45], and our analyses add another example to this body of work. Our study also contributes to the growing body of literature that describes the importance of non-additive gene action for evolutionary processes such as adaptation and speciation [19,43,46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%