2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.egg.2021.100096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic diversity and population structure of Indian willow (Salix tetrasperma Roxb.) along its distributional range in the Himalayan region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results reflect the outcrossing nature and high gene flow among genotypes. The genetic diversity patterns with moderate gene flow obtained in the current study were similar to those obtained with codominant markers (Sharma et al 2021) suggesting the use of both types of markers for studying genetic variation in this species. The present study has generated valuable information for tree breeders to exploit natural populations of S. tetrasperma and will prove useful for framing new conservation and breeding strategies and their effective implementation in future improvement programmes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results reflect the outcrossing nature and high gene flow among genotypes. The genetic diversity patterns with moderate gene flow obtained in the current study were similar to those obtained with codominant markers (Sharma et al 2021) suggesting the use of both types of markers for studying genetic variation in this species. The present study has generated valuable information for tree breeders to exploit natural populations of S. tetrasperma and will prove useful for framing new conservation and breeding strategies and their effective implementation in future improvement programmes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In a combined analysis of RAPD and ISSR marker types, AMOVA (Table 4) revealed more genetic variation (87%) within population than among population (13%) due to general characteristics of trees and shrubs (Hamrick et al 1992). The within population variation was recorded higher than the among population variation with SSR markers (Sharma et al 2021). This has also been verified in case of other tree species (Sulima et al 2018;Srihari et al 2013;Sandeep et al 2020) and is in line with the earlier studies which have confirmed that the high rates of out-crossing, life history and seed distribution over a wide range of area may be responsible for possession of genetic variations by woody perennial species majorly within the populations (Hamrick et al 1992;Li et al 2008;Khadivi-Khub et al 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%