2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11105-016-1006-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Diversity and Structure of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Germplasm Based on Morphological and SSR Markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
22
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
9
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The average observed heterozygosity value was 0.37 in our collection, and this was higher than Italian grass pea germplasm [46] and comparable to reported values of 0.39 and 0.40 in Ethiopian grass pea germplasms studied by Ponnaiah and coauthors [47] and Shiferaw and coauthors [21], respectively. The expected heterozygosity was greater than the observed heterozygosity which is similar to other results in grass pea [29], pear [48], apple [49] and pea [50]. The highest number of alleles and expected heterozygosity were observed with the EST-SSR marker in locus S6, which was characterized as the most informative fragment because high values for these parameters exhibit the power of an SSR marker for differentiating accessions [51].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The average observed heterozygosity value was 0.37 in our collection, and this was higher than Italian grass pea germplasm [46] and comparable to reported values of 0.39 and 0.40 in Ethiopian grass pea germplasms studied by Ponnaiah and coauthors [47] and Shiferaw and coauthors [21], respectively. The expected heterozygosity was greater than the observed heterozygosity which is similar to other results in grass pea [29], pear [48], apple [49] and pea [50]. The highest number of alleles and expected heterozygosity were observed with the EST-SSR marker in locus S6, which was characterized as the most informative fragment because high values for these parameters exhibit the power of an SSR marker for differentiating accessions [51].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Jing et al (2010) studied the genetic diversity of 3020 Pisum accessions using RBIP markers, which separated the landraces, cultivars and wild Pisum accessions into distinct groups, and provided a framework for designing core collections. Genetic variation of pea accessions based on SSR markers has also been reported in other studies and the test accessions were clustered into distinct gene pools (Kumari et al, 2013; Jain et al, 2014; Rana et al, 2017; Wu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Pea growth habit can be indeterminate or determinate, and cotyledon color can be yellow, green or red. Pea accessions also differ substantially in yield potential, ease of harvest, vine length, maturity, seed shape, seed size, and disease resistance (Ouafi et al, 2016; Rana et al, 2017). Thus, knowledge of the genetic diversity of pea accessions is of importance to select genetically diverse parents and to broaden the genetic basis of the cultivated peas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is suggested that use of morphological traits is unavoidable for distinctness, uniformity, and stability (Roldán-Ruiz et al, 2001;Cupic et al, 2009). Researchers have utilized morphological variability in combination with molecular markers to precisely estimate characteristic diversity for drawing inferences in many crops, including pea (Smýkal et al, 2008a;Sharma et al, 2010;Rana et al, 2017). In this study, the T8 landrace was determined as a promising landrace in terms of hay weight, plant height, hay crude protein, and relative feed value for yield and quality compared to commercial cultivars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%