2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11105-015-0908-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Diversity, Genotype Discrimination, and Population Structure of Mexican Opuntia sp., Determined by SSR Markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
15
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The resolution of molecular techniques is not high enough to find genetic differences between different Opuntia species. For example, Samah et al [ 81 ], using 88 accessions and 13 SSR markers, found significant genetic differences between O . robusta and two groups: one of them constituted by O .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resolution of molecular techniques is not high enough to find genetic differences between different Opuntia species. For example, Samah et al [ 81 ], using 88 accessions and 13 SSR markers, found significant genetic differences between O . robusta and two groups: one of them constituted by O .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of morphological descriptors comprising cladode, flower and fruit traits yielded a high number of morphotypes and allowed the discrimination of all of the studied species. In previous studies, the discrimination level was found to be as high as those reported by other studies using molecular markers for Opuntia spp (Labra et al 2003, García-Zambrano et al 2006, Zoghlami et al 2007, García-Zambrano et al 2009, Caruso et al 2010, Majure et al 2012, El-Banna et al 2013, Valadez-Moctezuma et al 2014, Ganopoulos et al 2015, Samah et al 2016.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…According to Samah and Valadez-Moctezuma (2014), the absence of pulp and the presence of an edible pericarp and small seeds are the most significant morphological differences between prickly pears and xoconostles. However, no clear separation between xoconostles and prickly pears has been found using RAPD and ISSR markers , biochemical markers (seed storage proteins), or SSR markers (Samah et al, , 2016. In addition, Espinoza Sánchez et al (2014) did not find any tendency of separation between these two types of fruit using AFLP markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%