2011
DOI: 10.4238/vol10-1gmr993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic diversity in local and commercial dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) accessions based on microsatellite markers

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Dry beans are considered to be a crop of great socioeconomic importance, because they are an inexpensive source of nutrients and because their cultivation requires considerable manual labor. Studies of genetic diversity have been very important for genetic improvement programs, because they give parameters for the identification of genitors that can provide large heterosis effects and improved segregation in recombinants, increasing the probability of obtaining superior genotypes in the progeny. We e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
24
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ever since their development, they have constantly been modified to enhance their utilizations and to be more and more important for the analyses of the genome and genetic diversity (Vieira et al, 2007;Gonçalves et al, 2009;Oliveira et al, 2010). Molecular markers permit us to make estimates of genetic diversity directly at the DNA level, reduc ing the interference of environmental factors (Cabral et al, 2011). Also, many markers are available for each genome, there are high levels of polymorphism, and they are free of pleiotropic effects (Leal et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ever since their development, they have constantly been modified to enhance their utilizations and to be more and more important for the analyses of the genome and genetic diversity (Vieira et al, 2007;Gonçalves et al, 2009;Oliveira et al, 2010). Molecular markers permit us to make estimates of genetic diversity directly at the DNA level, reduc ing the interference of environmental factors (Cabral et al, 2011). Also, many markers are available for each genome, there are high levels of polymorphism, and they are free of pleiotropic effects (Leal et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, many markers are available for each genome, there are high levels of polymorphism, and they are free of pleiotropic effects (Leal et al, 2010). During recent decades, SSRs (simple sequence repeats), also known as microsatellites, have become the most popular source of genetic markers owing to their high reproducibility, multi-allelic nature, codominant inheritance, high abundance, and wide genome coverage (Sharma et al, 2007;Demir et al, 2010;Cabral et al, 2011). The high infor mation content in SSR loci, together with their codominant expression, make SSRs ideal for genomic mapping, population genetics, conservation biology, marker-assisted selection, and other studies (Roa et al, 2000;Ellegren, 2004;Schlötterer, 2004;Leal et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, 112 polymorphic amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) bands (Maras et al, 2008) were produced to detect genetic diversity within a set of 29 common bean accessions. Cabral et al (2011) used simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers to identify genetic diversity in dry bean accessions to detect 29 polymorphic alleles. However, the use of these markers has generated a limited number of polymorphic bands from which to determine the genetic diversity (Gaitán-Solís et al, 2002;Svetleva et al, 2006;Gill-Langarica et al, 2011;De La Fuente et al, 2013) and, clearly, a larger number of markers are needed to cover the genome and assess genetic diversity for common bean.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular markers are valuable tools for estimating genetic diversity (Vieira et al, 2007;Gonçalves et al, 2009;Oliveira et al, 2010;Cabral et al, 2011). These markers can be used to directly measure genetic diversity at the DNA level, eliminating the influence of environmental variations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%