2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic diversity is considered important but interpreted narrowly in country reports to the Convention on Biological Diversity: Current actions and indicators are insufficient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the increase in human population, the demands of dairy and meat products, such as eggs, meat, and milk, have also increased. This has encouraged the poultry farming and livestock raising, which are actually considered as the main door for persuading the transmission of various viruses from the wildlife world to the human world [35]. The reduction in green cover of the Earth will severely affect our lives in the long run.…”
Section: Impact Of Covid-19 On Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the increase in human population, the demands of dairy and meat products, such as eggs, meat, and milk, have also increased. This has encouraged the poultry farming and livestock raising, which are actually considered as the main door for persuading the transmission of various viruses from the wildlife world to the human world [35]. The reduction in green cover of the Earth will severely affect our lives in the long run.…”
Section: Impact Of Covid-19 On Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar suggestion to include a ‘genetic threat’ in the red list process has been made several times (Garner et al 2020; Willoughby et al 2015). We truly think that it is now feasible and necessary for the red list to do so, as the genetic threats to species are growing in impact, and as genetic technologies and knowledge of genetic processes are ever more accessible (Hoban et al 2021b; Parli et al 2021; Taft et al 2020). Assessors could be asked to input the numbers of historic populations and current populations, and estimates of the census size of each population, in tables which would then be amenable to large scale analysis across many species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hoban et al (2020) develops this framework and defines three genetic indicators, suitable for CBD reporting: 1) the number of populations with effective population size (Ne) above versus below 500, 2) the proportion of populations (or geographic range) maintained within species, 3) the number of species and populations in which genetic diversity is monitored using DNA-based methods. [2] Further elaboration of these proposed indicators have been provided in subsequent work, including the suggestion to use the census population size, Nc>5000 as a proxy for Ne>500 when the Ne/Nc ratio is not known for the focal species; in other words to assume an Ne/Nc ratio of 0.1 (Hoban et al 2021a; Hoban et al 2021b; Laikre et al 2021). Currently, the Ne-indicator is proposed as a Headline Indicator in the post-2020 CBD Global Biodiversity Framework, while the proportion of populations maintained-indicator is proposed as a Component Indicator and the DNA-based indicator is suggested as a Complementary Indicator (CBD/WG2020/3/3/Add.1; CBD/WG2020/2/INF/2;CBD/SBSTTA/24/3Add.1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern biodiversity conservation strategies rely, or at least should, on the knowledge of genetic resources ( Gepts, 2006 ; Hoban et al, 2021 ). Big efforts were made in the exploration of genetic resources in the last decades ( Halewood et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%