2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Diversity of Giardia duodenalis: Multilocus Genotyping Reveals Zoonotic Potential between Clinical and Environmental Sources in a Metropolitan Region of Brazil

Abstract: Background Giardia duodenalis is a flagellate protozoan that parasitizes humans and several other mammals. Protozoan contamination has been regularly documented at important environmental sites, although most of these studies were performed at the species level. There is a lack of studies that correlate environmental contamination and clinical infections in the same region. The aim of this study is to evaluate the genetic diversity of a set of clinical and environmental samples and to use the obtained data to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
65
1
9

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
11
65
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, all the G. duodenalis-positive specimens were assemblage B, which is consistent with previous studies [15,16,18]. Assemblage B is common in humans worldwide [6,17,27,28]; therefore, NHPs may contribute to sporadic human infection [23,24]. Of the 25 G. duodenalis-positive specimens, the bg, tpi, and gdh loci were successfully amplified and sequenced from 21, 21, and 20 specimens, respectively ( Table 3).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, all the G. duodenalis-positive specimens were assemblage B, which is consistent with previous studies [15,16,18]. Assemblage B is common in humans worldwide [6,17,27,28]; therefore, NHPs may contribute to sporadic human infection [23,24]. Of the 25 G. duodenalis-positive specimens, the bg, tpi, and gdh loci were successfully amplified and sequenced from 21, 21, and 20 specimens, respectively ( Table 3).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Compared with other countries, the average infection rate in this study was closed to that in Thailand (7.0%, 14/200) [9] and Uganda (11.1%, 9/81) [10], but lower than that in North-West India (31.2%, 53/170) [11]. The differences of infection rates in NHPs may be related to animal health status, detection methods, or geo-ecological conditions [2,8,15,16,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. Nested PCR protocols based on single-copy genes (bg, tpi and gdh) had considerable lower diagnostic sensitivities than those based on multiple-copy genes (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Despite the efforts to relate the subgroups to the symptoms of giardiasis, conflicting results have been observed, and to date, there is no definitive correlation between the genotype and clinical symptoms (1). However, the AI genotype has been frequently reported in infected animals, whereas genotype AII has been observed in humans (2, 23) and might be responsible for clinical symptoms of giardiasis, including diarrhea (9,13,17). Colli et al (3) observed the presence of subgroup BIV in 2 (18.18%) of 11 positive vegetable samples, as well as in human samples in the same municipality, in a region near the one sampled in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 41%
“…Subgroup AII predominated in our samples, and subassemblages AI, AII, BIII, and BIV are potentially zoonotic (9). Despite the efforts to relate the subgroups to the symptoms of giardiasis, conflicting results have been observed, and to date, there is no definitive correlation between the genotype and clinical symptoms (1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In South America, most studies have focused on childhood infections and both assemblages have been identified [9,10,18,19], with a predominance of assemblage B [9,18,19]. In Brazil, assemblages A and B have also been recovered from human infections in different populations including children [14,[20][21][22][23], hospital patients [22,24,25] and fishing village populations [26]. Assemblages A and B sequences have been further classified to subassemblages AI, AII, BIII and BIV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%