2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00606-011-0536-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic diversity of some wild almonds and related Prunus species revealed by SSR and EST-SSR molecular markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The average PIC value of EST-SSR loci (0.66) was lower than that of genomic SSR loci (0.80). The present results fit well with previous studies that suggested that EST-SSRs were less polymorphic than their genomic counterparts in other almond genotypes (Rahemi et al 2012) and other species (Tahan et al 2009). However, they are in contrast with results of Xie et al (2006), reporting that genomic and EST-SSR primers amplified similar numbers of alleles.…”
Section: Polymorphism Analysis Of the Ssr Markerssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The average PIC value of EST-SSR loci (0.66) was lower than that of genomic SSR loci (0.80). The present results fit well with previous studies that suggested that EST-SSRs were less polymorphic than their genomic counterparts in other almond genotypes (Rahemi et al 2012) and other species (Tahan et al 2009). However, they are in contrast with results of Xie et al (2006), reporting that genomic and EST-SSR primers amplified similar numbers of alleles.…”
Section: Polymorphism Analysis Of the Ssr Markerssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These studies established the value of SSR markers for distinguishing different genetic lineages and detected an extensive gene pool available to almond genetic improvement. Promising Iranian almond genotypes, wild almonds, and related Prunus species were also characterized by SSR and EST-SSR markers (Zeinalabedini et al 2012;Rahemi et al 2012). Nuclear DNA markers showed that Moroccan genotypes were genetically different from the tested commercial cultivars and therefore formed a separate genetic pool (El Hamzaoui et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After pre-screening, 35 primer (Genscript, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China) pairs were chosen that gave distinct, reproducible, and polymorphic amplification products at one or more loci in beach plums. A set of 11 SSR primer pairs were selected on the basis of previous reports of different Prunus species (Rahemi 2012), including BPPCT004, BPPCT007, BPPCT028, BPPCT032, BPPCT039, CPPCT026, CPPCT039, and UDP98-409 as representatives of peaches (Aranza and Dirlewanger 2002, Cipriani 1999, and CPDCT025, CPDCT027, and CPDCT042 for almonds (Table 2). Eleven pairs of primers marked in italics were the effective primers used in this study.…”
Section: Primer Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total genomic DNA was extracted from dried leaves using CTAB protocol (Doyle and Doyle 1987) with some modification (Ortega et al 2005;Rahemi et al 2012b). DNA quantity and quality were determined by spectrophotometry and agarose gel electrophoresis.…”
Section: Dna Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%