2019
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2018.12.0745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Evaluation of Exotic Chromatins from Two Obsolete Interspecific Introgression Lines of Upland Cotton for Fiber Quality Improvement

Abstract: Interspecific introgression lines are important resources for plant breeders to access novel alleles from exotic germplasm. The Pee Dee breeding program developed several extra‐long staple “Sealand” germplasm lines that presumably contain sea island cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.) chromatin introgressed into upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). The objectives of this study were to identify the G. barbadense chromatins in the Sealand lines, 542 and 883, and evaluate their effects on fiber quality. A total of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SL883 was crossed with four G. hirsutum parents, chosen for their representation of the four major cotton growing regions in the United States: Acala SJ‐4 (C6TE/NMB3080), representing the desert Southwest; PMHS26 (Acala SJ‐4/5B9‐184), from the Texas High Plains; DP50 (DP 16//DP Smoothleaf/DP 45/3/DES56), of the Mississippi Delta region; and GA089 (PD 94042/AP 7126), an unreleased breeding line from the University of Georgia representing the southeastern United States. Initiated in 2006 at Tifton, GA, these four crosses were made as a fiber quality QTL mapping project (Kumar et al., ). F 1 plants were grown in the greenhouse over the winter, and F 2 seed was planted in the summer of 2007 at the University of Georgia, Coastal Plain Experiment Station's Gibbs Research Farm in Tifton.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…SL883 was crossed with four G. hirsutum parents, chosen for their representation of the four major cotton growing regions in the United States: Acala SJ‐4 (C6TE/NMB3080), representing the desert Southwest; PMHS26 (Acala SJ‐4/5B9‐184), from the Texas High Plains; DP50 (DP 16//DP Smoothleaf/DP 45/3/DES56), of the Mississippi Delta region; and GA089 (PD 94042/AP 7126), an unreleased breeding line from the University of Georgia representing the southeastern United States. Initiated in 2006 at Tifton, GA, these four crosses were made as a fiber quality QTL mapping project (Kumar et al., ). F 1 plants were grown in the greenhouse over the winter, and F 2 seed was planted in the summer of 2007 at the University of Georgia, Coastal Plain Experiment Station's Gibbs Research Farm in Tifton.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Sealand germplasm lines are essentially G. hirsutum genotypes with exceptional FL and fiber bundle strength (STR) but mediocre agronomic performance. One of these lines, SL883, was discovered to be carrying introgressed segments from G. barbadense harboring several quantitative trait loci (QTL) for fiber quality traits (Kumar et al., ). One QTL in particular, qFL‐Chr.25 , had a large effect in the original biparental mapping population and when subsequently validated in four different cultivar genetic backgrounds, explained from 4.4 to 61.4% of the variation in FL (Kumar et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On a global scale, Pima cotton only accounts for approximately 3 to 5% of the total cotton production, whereas upland cotton accounts for the majority of the remainder (Fang, 2018). William Elliot was the first person to cultivate G. barbadense in the United Crop Science (Kumar et al, 2019). Today, upland cotton remains the only species of cotton produced commercially in the southeast United States, accounting for approximately $1.7 billion USD in 2019, with 1.2 million ha planted across Alabama, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina, and Virginia (USDA-National Agricultural Statistics Service, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%