2011 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icsmc.2011.6084018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic fuzzy system for servo motors with a buck converter

Abstract: The paper proposes a fuzzy control method with a real-time genetic algorithm for an uncertain DC server motor with a Buck converter. The parameters of the fuzzy system are online adjusted by the real-time genetic algorithm in order to generate appropriate control input. For the purpose of on-line evaluating the stability of the closed-loop system, an energy fitness function derived from backstepping technique is involved in the genetic algorithm. According to the experimental results, the genetic fuzzy control… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the model-free control strategies, proportional-integral-differential (PID) control has serious hysteresis that is unbeneficial to the stability of the system (Gao, 2006a). Adaptive control (Na et al , 2013), neural networks (NNS) (Fukuda and Shibata, 1992), fuzzy systems (Lee et al , 2011) and their combination (Abbasimoshaei et al , 2020; Abbasi Moshaii et al , 2019) have heavy computational burden; hence, they are not suitable for real-time control (Na et al , 2013; Wang et al , 2019; Lin and Wai, 2001). To reduce the response time and the computational burden, Extended-State-Observer (ESO) was first proposed as the core of active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) (Han, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the model-free control strategies, proportional-integral-differential (PID) control has serious hysteresis that is unbeneficial to the stability of the system (Gao, 2006a). Adaptive control (Na et al , 2013), neural networks (NNS) (Fukuda and Shibata, 1992), fuzzy systems (Lee et al , 2011) and their combination (Abbasimoshaei et al , 2020; Abbasi Moshaii et al , 2019) have heavy computational burden; hence, they are not suitable for real-time control (Na et al , 2013; Wang et al , 2019; Lin and Wai, 2001). To reduce the response time and the computational burden, Extended-State-Observer (ESO) was first proposed as the core of active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) (Han, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%