2017
DOI: 10.1080/24701394.2016.1261853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic identification for prey birds of the Endangered peregrine falcon ( Falco peregrinus )

Abstract: To reveal the dietary ecology of the peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus), we conducted a molecular analysis for mitochondrial genes (COI and CYTB) to identify the prey species collected from a feeding place found on Sasu Island, South Korea. The results from noninvasive genetic analysis showed that the sequences obtained came from nine species of birds (Cuculus canorus, Eurystomus orientalis, Limosa limosa, Microscelis amaurotis, Oriolus chinensis, Phasianus colchicus, Sterna hirundo, Streptopelia orientalis, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HTS has been used to assess the diet composition of a wide taxonomic range of animals. Animals whose diets have been successfully investigated have included mammals (Buglione et al., 2018; De Barba et al., 2014; Esnaola et al., 2018; Robeson et al., 2017), birds (Crisol‐Martinìez et al., 2016; Han & Oh, 2018), reptiles (Caut et al., 2019; Kartzinel & Pringle, 2015; Koizumi et al., 2017), fish (Barbato et al., 2019; Harms‐Tuohy et al., 2016; Riccioni et al., 2018) and arthropods (Kamenova et al., 2018; Kennedy et al., 2020; Krehenwinkel et al., 2016). For most species, faecal samples, in contrast to stomach contents, can easily be obtained, with a minimal level of interaction and harm inflicted on the studied animal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HTS has been used to assess the diet composition of a wide taxonomic range of animals. Animals whose diets have been successfully investigated have included mammals (Buglione et al., 2018; De Barba et al., 2014; Esnaola et al., 2018; Robeson et al., 2017), birds (Crisol‐Martinìez et al., 2016; Han & Oh, 2018), reptiles (Caut et al., 2019; Kartzinel & Pringle, 2015; Koizumi et al., 2017), fish (Barbato et al., 2019; Harms‐Tuohy et al., 2016; Riccioni et al., 2018) and arthropods (Kamenova et al., 2018; Kennedy et al., 2020; Krehenwinkel et al., 2016). For most species, faecal samples, in contrast to stomach contents, can easily be obtained, with a minimal level of interaction and harm inflicted on the studied animal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of what we currently understand is based on opportunistic observations and correlations of peak movement activity between migrant raptors and probable migrant prey at individual locations along a migration route (Aborn 1994, Nicoletti 1997. While DNA metabarcoding methods are increasingly being used to investigate the foraging ecology of various wildlife species when direct observations are not feasible (Pompanon et al 2012), few studies have focused on raptor diet using prey DNA (DeLong et al 2013, Han & Oh 2018, Nota et al 2019, Tobe et al 2020. To date, DNA metabarcoding remains an under-utilized technique for advancing the field of avian migration ecology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%