1995
DOI: 10.1016/0044-8486(94)00245-j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic improvement of common carp strains using intraspecific hybridization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
1
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
31
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…When the narrow sense heritability is low, but the non-additive variation or dominance effect is high, heterosis can be easily achieved by crossbreeding. It is reported that selective breeding was not efficient for genetic improvement of the growth rate in the common carp, but genetic improvement by crossbreeding was easily obtained (Moav and Wohlfarth, 1976;Ankorion et al, 1992;Wohlfarth, 1993;Bakos and Gorda, 1995;Hulata, 1995;Vandeputte, 2003). Meanwhile, significant heterosis in the common carp has also been obtained by crossbreeding in China.…”
Section: Heterosismentioning
confidence: 92%
“…When the narrow sense heritability is low, but the non-additive variation or dominance effect is high, heterosis can be easily achieved by crossbreeding. It is reported that selective breeding was not efficient for genetic improvement of the growth rate in the common carp, but genetic improvement by crossbreeding was easily obtained (Moav and Wohlfarth, 1976;Ankorion et al, 1992;Wohlfarth, 1993;Bakos and Gorda, 1995;Hulata, 1995;Vandeputte, 2003). Meanwhile, significant heterosis in the common carp has also been obtained by crossbreeding in China.…”
Section: Heterosismentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The preferential use of a cumulative response from selection instead of crossbreeding programs is primarily due to the low level of expressed heterosis, possible effects of the genotype on non-additive genetic performance via environmental interactions and the dependence on a specialized hatchery for producing hybrid fingerlings in each cycle (Gjerde and Refstie, 1984;Bentsen et al, 1998). In contrast, hybrid crosses have been demonstrated to perform better than pure lines in some instances, e.g., the common carp, Cyprinus carpio (Bakos and Gorda, 1995;Hulata, 1995), and hybrid crossing was shown to be successful in breeding programs in carp (Wohlfarth et al, 1980;Kirpichnikov, 1981;Wohlfarth, 1993) and tilapia (Circa et al, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In a successful long-term program based on genetic selection and hybridisation for the development of inbred pure lines of carp in Hungary (Bakos, 1979;Bakos & Gorda, 1995), the use of such a technique resulted in very productive hybrids (Nagy et aI., 1979). Although the first gynogenetic individuals produced in a line typically perform rather poorly due to inbreeding effects, in trout they can be hormonally sex-reversed to functional males that produce only Xbearing sperm.…”
Section: Chromosome Manipulationmentioning
confidence: 99%