2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2109.2000.00393.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic improvement of marine fish - which method for industry?

Abstract: Aquaculture industries and research organizations usually fail to exploit genetics as a tool for enhancing productivity and competitiveness. Yet, there is now some awareness among aquaculturists of the benefits from genetics. There remains little consensus about the types of genetic approaches that are most beneficial for the aquaculture industry. Discord arises because genetics comprises many subdisciplines, each with advocates promoting one field or another as the best method to develop commercially valuable… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, by inhibiting sexual maturation, it is not possible to obtain fish with a specific skin color, in accordance with market demands, given that the external appearance is limited to that of specimens that have not reached sexual maturity, with all the variations particular to the population under study, and therefore, selective breeding to improve color in these fish seems appropriate. In the case of characters with monogenetic control, implementation of systematic recovery programs aimed at qualitative traits in aquaculture installations (deliberate recovery of mutants) can be considered (Knibb 2000). Nevertheless, this task may prove difficult, given that this phenotype depends on recessive genes whose frequency is low, or on the combination of rare alleles, that appear very occasionally in the progenies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, by inhibiting sexual maturation, it is not possible to obtain fish with a specific skin color, in accordance with market demands, given that the external appearance is limited to that of specimens that have not reached sexual maturity, with all the variations particular to the population under study, and therefore, selective breeding to improve color in these fish seems appropriate. In the case of characters with monogenetic control, implementation of systematic recovery programs aimed at qualitative traits in aquaculture installations (deliberate recovery of mutants) can be considered (Knibb 2000). Nevertheless, this task may prove difficult, given that this phenotype depends on recessive genes whose frequency is low, or on the combination of rare alleles, that appear very occasionally in the progenies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The culture of improved stocks would provide the opportunity to standardize and improve product appearance, contributing considerably to achieving greater stability and expansion of the industry (Knibb 2000). The limited development of this aspect in the salmon farming, contrasts with the use of color applied to other characters, in various species animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When there are not good genetic programs, regional fish farming enterprises insufficient selectivity studies and outnumbered in the breeding populations were trying to do with and is an unplanned selectivity intensive inbreeding has led to the emergence of farming. This situation has put pressure on the genetic diversity of wild populations to extinction even been reported to cause (Knibb, 2000).…”
Section: Mtdna Molecular Marker Used To Determine Genetics Distortionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attempt has been focusing on understanding of the process of changes in genetics of wild population using mitochondrial DNA molecular markers. Because, genetic diversity measurement in wild fish populations is significant for understanding and effective management of these populations (Farias, 2001;Knibb, 2000;Okumus and Cifci, 2003;Aquilino et al, 2011;Cawthorn et al, 2011;Lakra et al, 2011;Mecklenburg et al, 2011;Kartavtsev et al, 2009;Ward et al, 2005;Hubert et al, 2008;Nicolas et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large part of aquaculture production still relies on wild spawn or broodstock. Fish species such as carp, catfish, seabass, seabream and several other marine species are periodically 'refreshed' by introducing wild spawners (Gjedrem, 2000;Knibb, 2000). The diversity of fish species exploited for aquaculture, the molecular resources available and other logistical problems related to controlled breeding, the dimension and structure of the industry and the long investment period before dividend, means that genetic selection of fish for economically important traits is still in its infancy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%