2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01012.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic influence demonstrated for MEG-recorded somatosensory evoked responses

Abstract: We tested for a genetic influence on magnetoencephalogram (MEG)-recorded somatosensory evoked fields (SEFs) in 20 monozygotic (MZ) and 14 dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs. Previous electroencephalogram (EEG) studies that demonstrated a genetic contribution to evoked responses generally focused on characteristics of representative brain potentials. Here we demonstrate significantly smaller amplitude differences within MZ compared to DZ twin pairs for the complete SEF time series (across left and right hand SEFs: 0.37 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One hundred subjects (50 same-sex monozygotic twin pairs) will be studied using both resting and task evoked MEG. The use of twin pairs allows evaluation of heritable traits, and recent studies have shown that MEG responses to somatosensory stimuli are partly heritable (Van’t Ent et al, 2010). These 100 subjects will also participate in the full HCP study design including structural and functional magnetic resonance image studies (MRI, fMRI), diffusion tensor imaging (dMRI) and behavioral and genetic testing (see (Van Essen et al, 2012)).…”
Section: The Electrophysiological Approach To Connectomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One hundred subjects (50 same-sex monozygotic twin pairs) will be studied using both resting and task evoked MEG. The use of twin pairs allows evaluation of heritable traits, and recent studies have shown that MEG responses to somatosensory stimuli are partly heritable (Van’t Ent et al, 2010). These 100 subjects will also participate in the full HCP study design including structural and functional magnetic resonance image studies (MRI, fMRI), diffusion tensor imaging (dMRI) and behavioral and genetic testing (see (Van Essen et al, 2012)).…”
Section: The Electrophysiological Approach To Connectomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, it has been reported that amplitude and dipole moment of MEF1 does not change even if finger movement intensity and frequency are changed (Mayville et al, 2005; Onishi et al, 2006). In addition, Van’t Ent et al (2010) reported that amplitude of somatosensory-evoked magnetic field (SEF) is influenced by genetics. SEF induced by electrical nerve stimulation reflects peripheral afferents as well as MEF1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, using EEG, the genetic effects on amplitudes and waveforms of several evoked potentials were reported by comparing MZ twins with DZ twins or unrelated pairs (Lewis et al, 1972). Recently, Van’t Ent et al (2010) revealed genetic influences on waveform amplitude and morphology of entire time series of somatosensory-evoked brain activity in a sample of MZ and DZ twins. However, published twin studies concerning brain activity were limited to primary sensory functions such as visual, auditory, and somatosensory-evoked potentials, and there are no reports to this date on motor-related brain function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of EEGs in twins demonstrated that much of the variance in EEG power during the resting state is explained by genetic factors 17 . Similarly, MEG studies involving twins demonstrated that genetic factors have a large effect on MEG responses during somatosensory 18 and motor tasks 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%