1998
DOI: 10.1038/1142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic influence on language delay in two-year-old children

Abstract: Previous work suggests that most clinically significant language difficulties in children do not result from acquired brain lesions or adverse environmental experiences but from genetic factors that presumably influence early brain development. We conducted the first twin study of language delay to evaluate whether genetic and environmental factors at the lower extreme of delayed language are different from those operating in the normal range. Vocabulary at age two was assessed for more than 3000 pairs of twin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
174
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
11
174
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Scores for all children were then compared to the appropriate norms (Fenson et al, 1993); scores falling at or below the 5th percentile were deemed to represent a clinically significant language delay (e.g., Dale et al, 1998).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scores for all children were then compared to the appropriate norms (Fenson et al, 1993); scores falling at or below the 5th percentile were deemed to represent a clinically significant language delay (e.g., Dale et al, 1998).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, twins and singletons are comparable with respect to the quality of their peer relations such as the number of friends, friendship features, or the level of victimization by peers (Laffey-Ardley and Thorpe;Lamarche et al 2007;Thorpe 2003). Twins also do not seem to differ from singletons in regard to theory of mind (Cassidy et al 2005), but twins are known to show a 2 to 4 month delay in early language development compared to singletons (Dale et al 1998;Thorpe 2003). Specific comparisons of identical (monozygotic) and nonidentical (dizyogtic) twins suggest no zygosity differences in regard to sociocognitive and language development, aggressive behavior and children's peer relationships (Lemelin et al 2007;Lamarche et al 2007;Thorpe 2003).…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(monozygotic) and nonidentical (dizyogtic) twins suggest no zygosity differences in regard to sociocognitive and language development, aggressive behavior and children's peer relationships (Lemelin et al 2007;Lamarche et al 2007;Thorpe 2003). However, there is some evidence that mixed-gender siblings slightly outperform same-gender siblings in regard to language and cognitive development (Cassidy et al 2005;Dale et al 1998;Pulkkinen et al 2003). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, 31% of mothers in TEDS had A-levels whereas for the age-weighted 1996 UK General Household Survey census data 32% had Alevels. After excluding twin pairs with birth, medical, zygosity or data problems, 11 our sample included 3636 children in 1818 twin pairs: 608 identical (MZ) pairs, 623 same-sex nonidentical (DZ) pairs, with approximately equal numbers of boys and girls, and 587 opposite-sex DZ pairs. Selecting the top 5% of twins using weight corrected for height (see below) yielded 58 MZ twin probands and 65 DZ twin probands in 41 MZ twin pairs and 53 DZ twin pairs.…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%